Table 3.
Summary of linear mixed effects models analyzed in Study 2
| Lexical Recognition RT | Semantic Processing RT | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||||
| Predictors | Estimates | p | Estimates | p | Estimates | p |
| (Intercept) | 915.79 | <0.001 | 977.62 | <0.001 | 977.61 | <0.001 |
| Log Frequency (Year 2000) | -63.55 | <0.001 | 3.50 | 0.609 | 3.71 | 0.590 |
| Word Length | 28.14 | <0.001 | -21.36 | 0.002 | -21.36 | 0.002 |
| Age of Acquisition (AOA) | 79.17 | <0.001 | 10.53 | 0.105 | 10.48 | 0.107 |
| Emotionality | -3.50 | 0.075 | -11.20 | 0.108 | -11.47 | 0.102 |
| Valence | -6.49 | 0.001 | -15.69 | 0.018 | -15.83 | 0.017 |
| Arousal | -28.87 | <0.001 | 1.27 | 0.855 | 1.45 | 0.835 |
| Concreteness | -7.59 | 0.001 | -46.65 | <0.001 | -38.29 | <0.001 |
| Age (Continuous) | 1.86 | <0.001 | ||||
| Age (Middle-aged Adults = TRUE) | 48.69 | 0.043 | 48.93 | 0.042 | ||
| Semantic Stability btw 1970-2000 | -2.48 | 0.218 | -20.80 | 0.001 | -11.46 | 0.091 |
| Middle-aged:Semantic Stability | -18.93 | <0.001 | ||||
| Middle-aged:Concreteness | -16.70 | <0.001 | ||||
| Concreteness:Semantic Stability | 0.38 | 0.956 | ||||
| Middle-aged:Concreteness:Semantic Stability | -6.59 | 0.083 | ||||
| Random Effects | ||||||
| σ2 | 327530.75 | 142385.96 | 142216.83 | |||
| τ00 | 17564.11 Word | 33545.40 id | 33545.82 id | |||
| 6465.37 Word | 6500.28 Word | |||||
| ICC | 0.05 | 0.22 | 0.22 | |||
| N | 5385 Word | 237 id | 237 id | |||
| 180 Word | 180 Word | |||||
| Observations | 3267383 | 42505 | 42505 | |||
| Marginal R2 / Conditional R2 | 0.056/0.104 | 0.018/0.233 | 0.019/0.235 | |||
Age is coded as a categorical variable (Younger adults = 0, Middle-aged adults = 1) in the semantic decision task (Models 2 & 3) while it is a continuous variable in lexical decision task (Model 1). All continuous predictors are standardized.