Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 28;16:859731. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.859731

TABLE 2.

Voice preference response [(Voice > Silence) > (Non-voice > Silence)] correlation with hallucination proneness results.

ROI
LSHS
LSHS-Auditory
Hem. Label μ SD CI (95%) r p r p
L aSTG 1.189 0.479 0.203–0.434 0.120 0.576 0.178 0.406
mSTG 1.505 0.586 0.997–1.380 −0.237 0.267 −0.024 0.915
pSTG 1.511 0.560 1.271–1.740 −0.058 0.791 0.055 0.797
R aSTG 1.019 0.452 0.838–1.200 0.266 0.208 0.165 0.440
mSTG 1.295 0.515 1.089–1.501 −0.177 0.408 −0.033 0.882
pSTG 1.213 0.406 1.051–1.375 0.470 * 0.020 0.276 0.192
R pMC 0.625 0.447 0.446–0.804 0.087 0.685 −0.103 0.635
L IFC 0.319 0.288 0.204–0.434 −0.048 0.827 −0.025 0.911
R IFC 0.293 0.323 0.164–0.422 0.231 0.277 0.134 0.534

ROI, region of interest; (a/m/p) STG, (anterior/middle/posterior) superior temporal gyrus; pMC, premotor cortex; IFC, inferior frontal cortex; μ, mean activation from contrast; SD, standard deviation; LSHS, Launay-Slade Hallucination Proneness scale; LSHS-Auditory, subset of 3 auditory items, r = correlation coefficient, Bonferroni-corrected significance level (*p < 0.025).