Abstract
Probiotics have been widely used in the treatment of intestinal diseases, but the effect of probiotics on female reproductive tract health is still controversial. Lactobacillus is the most abundant microorganism in the vagina, which is related to the vaginal mucosal barrier. Lactobacillus adheres to the vaginal epithelium and can competitively antagonize the colonization of pathogens. The factors produced by Lactobacillus, such as bacteriocin and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), can inhibit the growth of pathogenic microorganisms and maintain the low pH environment of the vagina. Probiotics play an important role in maintaining the stability of vaginal microenvironment, improving immune defense and blocking the progression of cervical cancer. We review the research progress of probiotics represented by Lactobacillus in gynecological diseases such as human papilloma virus (HPV) infection, bacterial vaginosis (BV) and Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause (GSM), so as to provide basis for further exerting the role of probiotics in women’s health.
Keywords: probiotic, vaginal health, human papilloma virus, lactobacillus, vaginal microenvironment
Introduction
Vaginal microenvironment is composed of normal flora in vagina, endocrine regulation and mucosal epithelial barrier (Saraf et al., 2021). There are many microbial colonization in the vagina of healthy women, among which Lactobacillus plays a major role (95%) (Ilhan et al., 2019). Based on the different species of specific Lactobacillus, it can be divided into five different community state types (CSTs). Among them, CST I, II, III and V are mainly L. crispatus, L. gasseri, L. iners and L. jensenii respectively, while CST IV is on the contrary (Borgogna et al., 2020; Langner et al., 2021). It is represented by the reduction of lactic acid bacteria and there are strictly anaerobic species, such as Gardnerella, Megasphera and Prevotella. Among them, L. crispatus, L. gasseri and L. jensenii can produce lactic acid and H2O2, acidify the vaginal environment to pH < 4.5, and inhibit the growth of other viruses and bacteria (Anderson et al., 2014; Das et al., 2022). However, L. iners is considered to be a Lactobacillus in an excessive state (Pramanick et al., 2019). In addition, the metabolites produced by Lactobacillus can also stimulate the host to produce antimicrobial peptides and anti-inflammatory cytokines (Niu et al., 2017). Vaginal epithelial cells change periodically under the action of estrogen and progesterone. Glycogen produced in this process provides energy for the growth of Lactobacillus. Lactobacillus can also prevent invasive pathogens from adhering to vaginal epithelium through competitive rejection (Han and Ren, 2021).
Vaginal microecological balance is a dynamic process. Slight vaginal flora imbalance can be regulated by itself. Serious flora imbalance will lead to gynecological diseases (Chao et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2021). It is well known that cervical cancer is a cancer associated with HPV. Many studies have proved that the composition of vaginal microorganisms is related to the development of high-risk HPV infection and cervical lesions (Mitra et al., 2015; Jang et al., 2017; Mitra et al., 2020). The abundance of BV related bacteria, such as Gardnerella, may also increase the risk of cervical lesions during HPV infection (Wei et al., 2020). When women enter menopause, due to the decrease of estrogen level, the content of glycogen in epithelial cells and the number of Lactobacillus, pathogenic bacteria are easy to invade and reproduce, resulting in senile vaginitis (Athanasiou et al., 2016). Probiotics are a kind of active microorganisms that colonize the human intestinal tract and reproductive tract and are beneficial to the host. A large number of studies have proved that oral probiotics can treat a variety of digestive system diseases. Lactobacillus, as the most dominant bacterial species in the vaginal microenvironment, can maintain or change the vaginal microecological balance (Łaniewski et al., 2020; Piccioni et al., 2021). In this review, we focus on the role of probiotics in maintaining vaginal health in women.
Probiotics and cervical cancer
Cervical cancer is the first malignant tumor of female reproductive tract, and about 300000 people die of cervical cancer every year (Jahanshahi et al., 2020; Kovachev, 2020). When infected with HPV, it can destroy the vaginal microecological balance, reduce the number of Lactobacillus and increase the adhesion and colonization of abnormal flora. This further leads to the up regulation of HPV protein expression, promotes the development of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), and even leads to the occurrence of cervical cancer (Curty et al., 2019). Gao et al. (Gao et al., 2013) were the first to systematically evaluate the relationship between vaginal microbiota and HPV infection and found that vaginal bacterial diversity in HPV-positive women was more complex and the composition of vaginal microbiota was different. A study (DI Pierro et al., 2021) demonstrated for the first time that oral Lactobacillus curlicus can change the state of CST and increase HPV clearance. Persistent high-risk HPV infection and changes in cervical microenvironment promote the development of cervical precancerous lesions (Liu et al., 2020). Lactobacillus activates the immune system to inhibit the proliferation of malignant tumors by secreting various antitumor metabolites, including phosphorylated polysaccharides and extracellular polysaccharides. (Champer et al., 2018; Pourmollaei et al., 2020). There is an important link between increasing probiotic intake and reducing cancer progression.
Probiotics act directly on cervical cancer cells
As a kind of vaginal probiotics, Lactobacillus can not only acidify the vaginal environment, stabilize the vaginal flora and enhance the function of vaginal epithelial cells, but also kill cervical cancer cells. Lactobacilli adsorb and occupy the vaginal epithelium, preventing the adhesion of aggressive pathogenic bacteria that cause malignancies (Abdolalipour et al., 2020). Lactobacillus can inhibit cancer cell proliferation by secreting peptidoglycan and exopolysaccharides. Probiotics mainly enhance the immune process of the body, promote the production of cytokines, and inhibit the proliferation of monocytes. Recent studies have shown that probiotics such as Lactobacillus casei and Lactobacillus rhamnosus play an anticancer role by activating the maturation of NK cells and dendritic cells (Li et al., 2020; Kandati et al., 2022). Lactobacillus can also affect cellular and humoral immunity, promote the proliferation and differentiation of thymus derived cells, and further promote the immune recognition and proliferation of bone marrow-derived cells (Medina-Contreras et al., 2020). In addition, probiotic metabolites also have cytotoxic effects on cervical cancer cells. Wang et al. (Wang et al., 2019) found that the increase of Lactobacillus spp. was related to the decrease of the detection rate of high-risk subtype HPV infection, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer. Microbiota plays an increasingly important role in cancer and treatment (Xie et al., 2020). As a promising non chemotherapy alternative therapy, Lactobacillus has attracted extensive attention in restoring and maintaining normal vaginal flora and treating cervical cancer. As shown in Table 1, the effects of probiotics on cervical cancer cells are summarized.
Table 1.
Probiotics | Sources | Cell line | Results | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|
Lactobacillus plantarum 5BL | Vaginal secretions | HeLa | Lactobacillus can inhibit the activity of HeLa cells. | Nami et al., 2014 |
Lactobacillus gasseri and Lactobacillus crispatus | Commercial probiotics | HeLa | Supernatant of Lactobacillus is cytotoxic to cervical cancer cells. | Motevaseli et al., 2013 |
Lactobacillus gasseri | Vaginal secretions | HeLa | L. gasseri inhibits Hela cell proliferation and shows anti-inflammatory by reducing TNF-α. | Sungur et al., 2017 |
Bifidobacterium adolescentis SPM1005-A | Fecal samples | SiHa | Bifidobacterium can inhibit the expression of E6 and E7 oncogenes in SiHa cells. | Cha et al., 2012 |
Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Lactobacillus crispatus | Commercial probiotics | HeLa | Supernatants of these two Lactobacilli were cytotoxic to HeLa cells. | Nouri et al., 2016 |
Lactobacillus crispatus, L. jensenii, and L. gasseri | Commercial probiotics | Caski | Supernatant of Lactobacillus inhibits cervical cancer cells by regulating HPV oncogenes and cell cycle related genes. | Wang et al., 2018 |
Lactobacillus casei and Lactobacillus paracasei | Human breast milk | HeLa | Supernatant of Lactobacillus inhibits HeLa cells by regulating the expression of apoptotic genes. | Riaz Rajoka et al., 2018 |
Lactobacillus DM8909 | Laboratory culture | HeLa and U14 | Lactobacillus can inhibit HeLa and U14 cell migration by upregulating E-cadherin expression. | Li et al., 2017 |
Lactobacillus crispatus and Lactobacillus rhamnosus | Commercial probiotics | HeLa | Probiotic supernatant can inhibit the proliferation of HeLa cells by down regulating HPV oncogene. | Motevaseli et al., 2016 |
Probiotics reduce the side effects of radiotherapy for cervical cancers
Radiotherapy is one of the main methods for the treatment of cervical cancer, but there are many side effects, the most common of which is radiotherapy-induced diarrhea (RID), which brings a greater burden to patients (Hombrink et al., 2000; Jahanshahi et al., 2020). Probiotics have shown good effects in the treatment of digestive system diseases and can alleviate the adverse reactions caused by inflammation. Probiotics can be added to reduce the side effects of radiotherapy for cervical cancer and enhance the antitumor effect. A study (Okawa et al., 1993) of 228 patients with stage IIIB cervical cancer showed that patients receiving probiotics as adjuvants had longer survival than patients receiving radiotherapy alone. In another meta-analysis (Qiu et al., 2019) comparing the incidence of probiotics in the prevention of diarrhea caused by cervical cancer radiation therapy, the probiotics group had a lower incidence of RID, RR 0.61 (95% CI 0.46-0.81; P = 0.0007). Negi et al. (Negi et al., 2020) developed cisplatin and probiotic bioburden pessaries for the treatment of cervical cancer. Histopathological studies showed that the preparation was safe for local administration of cisplatin. More research, especially clinical trials, is needed to understand the specific mechanisms by which probiotics can alleviate the side effects of radiation therapy for cervical cancer. As shown in Table 2, the research of probiotics in preventing or reducing the adverse effects of cervical cancer treatment on gastrointestinal tract is summarized.
Table 2.
Probiotics | Methods | Findings | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|
Lactobacillus acidophilus plus bifidobacterium bifidum | Patients who received cisplatin and pelvic radiotherapy were divided into a probiotic group and a placebo group. | Probiotics reduced the incidence of RID and improved stool consistency. | Chitapanarux et al., 2010 |
Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5 plus Bifidobacterium animalis subsp | Patients were randomized to a probiotics group (containing 75 billion live freeze-dried bacteria) or a placebo group. | Probiotics reduced the incidence of diarrhea and grade 2 abdominal pain. | Linn et al., 2019 |
VSL#3 | Patients were assigned to either the high-potency probiotic preparation VSL#3 or placebo | Probiotic treatment reduces grade 3-4 diarrhea and reduces the number of bowel movements. | Delia et al., 2007 |
Lactobacillus acidophilus LAC-361 and Bifidobacterium longum BB-536 | Patients were randomized between a placebo and either of two regiments of double strain Bifilact(®) probiotics. | Probiotics reduce radiation-induced grade 2-3-4 diarrhea. | Demers et al., 2014 |
Lactobacillus casei DN-114 001 | Patients were randomly assigned to a probiotic drink or placebo. | Probiotic intervention had a significant effect on stool consistency. | Giralt et al., 2008 |
Application of probiotics in HPV therapeutic vaccine
HPV preventive vaccine can effectively prevent high-risk HPV infection, but cannot improve the treatment effect of cervical cancer. Therefore, researchers are currently focusing on developing therapeutic vaccines (Werner et al., 2012). HPV E6 and E7 oncoproteins are required for maintenance of the tumor phenotype and contribute to the progression of CIN2-3 to cervical cancer. HPV E6 and E7 are considered potential target antigens for therapeutic vaccines. HPV therapeutic vaccines can be divided into protein and peptide vaccines, DNA vaccines and bacterial vector vaccines (Taghinezhad et al., 2021). Among them, the vaccine based on bacteria is widely used. Many preclinical trials have proved that transgenic Lactobacillus is relatively safe, has the potential to deliver recombinant antigens, and can induce humoral and cellular immunity in the host and further kill HPV virus (Das et al., 2022). Komatsu et al. (Komatsu et al., 2018) developed a Lactobacillus casei (IGMKK16E7) therapeutic HPV vaccine with E7 endogenous expression. It was found that the expression level of E7 molecule was related to the induction efficiency of E7-specific mucosal immune response. Lee et al. (Lee et al) treated mice orally with the HPV16 E6 protein expressed on Lactobacillus casei and found that the vaccine could induce the production of E6-specific serum IgG and IgA. (Park et al. (2019) investigated an oral drug (BLS-M07) expressing the HPV 16 E7 antigen on the surface of Lactobacillus casei to evaluate its efficacy in CIN3 patients. The results demonstrated that oral administration of BLS-M07 increased the production of serum HPV16E7 specific antibodies. At present, therapeutic vaccine has no clinical application and is still in the stage of clinical trial. Many studies have proved that it is feasible to develop HPV therapeutic vaccine by using engineering bacteria represented by Lactobacillus. Future research seems to focus more on the use of such bacteria.
Effects of probiotics on BV
Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a mixed infectious diseases caused by the imbalance of normal flora in the vagina, which is characterized by the decrease of Lactobacillus and the increase of anaerobic bacteria, especially Gardnerella and Prevotella (Onderdonk et al., 2016; Bagnall and Rizzolo, 2017). The microbial community structure of BV is basically consistent with CST IV (Coleman and Gaydos, 2018). The traditional treatment method is to use metronidazole and other antibiotics. In fact, the recurrence rate of BV after oral metronidazole treatment is very high, and the systemic use of antibiotics has great side effects (Muzny et al., 2020). In this case, new treatment strategies help to improve treatment outcomes. The use of probiotics can improve vaginal flora, increase beneficial bacteria, reduce the number of harmful bacteria, and further maintain the stability of vaginal flora environment (Ling et al., 2013). Nowadays, there is increasing evidence that probiotics are effective in the treatment of BV. In a meta-analysis of 30 studies (Jeng et al., 2020), BV patients were followed up after treatment and found that probiotic intervention reduced the recurrence rate of vaginitis (OR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.18-0.41, P<0.001), Improve the cure rate of vaginitis (OR = 2.28, 95% CI: 1.20-4.32, P = 0.011). (Selis et al. (2021) proved through in vitro experiments that Lactobacillus plantarum Lp62 and its supernatant could significantly inhibit the growth of Gardnerella. In another meta-analysis of 18 studies (Liu and Yi, 2022) with 3-month follow-up, the combination of antibiotics and probiotics was found to significantly reduce the recurrence rate of BV compared with antibiotics alone. Inflammation is considered to be a predisposing factor for tumorigenesis and development. Experimental studies in humans and animals support the correlation between chronic inflammation and cancer. Chronic inflammation will increase the gene mutation rate, lead to cancer and promote tumor metastasis. Probiotics combined with antibiotics play an important role in the treatment of inflammation. As shown in Table 3, we summarize the clinical research on probiotic treatment of BV in recent years.
Table 3.
Probiotics | Methods | Results | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|
Lactobacillus acidophilus GLA-14 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 | Patients received metronidazole (500 mg, bid) for 7 days and were randomly assigned to concurrently receive probiotics plus lactoferrin or placebo (n=48). | Probiotic mixture combined with lactoferrin improved symptoms (vaginal discharge and itching), Nugent scores, and recurrence rates. | Russo et al., 2019 |
Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 and Lactobacillus reuteri RC-14 | Patients received oral metronidazole for 7 days, and probiotics and placebo for 30 days (n=125). | Combined use of probiotics and antibiotics improves BV cure rates. | Anukam et al., 2006 |
Lactobacillus crispatus LMG S-29995, Lactobacillus brevis, and Lactobacillus acidophilus | After completing metronidazole treatment, patients received probiotics and placebo, respectively (n=166). | Oral probiotics reduce the rate of BV recurrence and prolong the time to disease recurrence. | Reznichenko et al., 2020 |
Lactobacillus rhamnosus BMX 54 | After completing metronidazole treatment, patients received placebo and vaginal tablets containing probiotics, respectively (n=250). | Patients treated with probiotics had reduced BV recurrence rate and vaginal pH. | Recine et al., 2016 |
Lactobacillus crispatus LbV 88, Lactobacillus gasseri LbV 150N, Lactobacillus jensenii LbV 116 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus LbV96 | After completing metronidazole treatment, patients received placebo and yogurt with probiotics, respectively (n=36). | Yogurt with probiotics increases BV recovery rates and improves vaginal microbes. | Laue et al., 2018 |
L. brevis CD2, L. salivarius subsp. salicinius, L. plantarum | Patients were randomized to receive probiotic vaginal tablets and vaginal pH tablets (n=64). | Probiotics improve BV cure rates and reduce vaginal cytokines IL-1β and IL-6. | Hemalatha et al., 2012 |
Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 and L. reuteri RC-14 | Patients were treated with probiotics for 6 months and metronidazole for 10 days (n=65). | Supplementation with probiotics did not improve BV cure rates, but improved vaginal flora composition. | Hummelen et al., 2010 |
L. brevis (CD2), L. salivarius subsp.salicinius (FV2), and L. plantarum (FV9) | Patients received probiotic-containing vaginal tablets or placebo for 7 days (n=39). | Supplementation with probiotics can increase the cure rate of BV and improve the vaginal environment. | Mastromarino et al., 2009 |
Effect of probiotics on GSM
GSM was previously known as vulvovaginal atrophy or atrophic vaginitis (Caretto et al., 2017; Donders et al., 2019). When women reach perimenopause, ovarian function declines, resulting in lower estrogen levels. More than 50% of postmenopausal women will have a series of annoying symptoms, including vaginal dryness, pruritus, difficulty in sexual intercourse, urgency and increased frequency of urination, and urinary tract infection (Yoo et al., 2022). Especially after menopause, the decrease of Lactobacillus and the increase of other anaerobic bacteria (Gardnerella and Prevotella) make cervical cells prone to canceration. Currently approved treatment options for GSM include estrogen therapy and non estrogen therapy (Gambrell, 1986). Recent studies have found that probiotics combined with estrogen can alleviate the related symptoms caused by vulvovaginal atrophy. Petricevic and others (Petricevic et al., 2008) found in a randomized controlled study that oral probiotics (Lactobacillus rhamnosus Gr-1 and Lactobacillus reuteri RC-14) in postmenopausal women could significantly reduce Nugent score and improve GSM symptoms (P = 0.0001). In a randomized clinical trial (Ribeiro et al., 2018), the effect of estrogen with or without probiotics on GSM was investigated. Compared with estrogen alone, estrogen combined with probiotics significantly improved GSM symptoms, mainly vaginal dryness and dyspareunia, and increased vaginal health scores. Lim (Lim et al., 2021) also found that the intestinal microbial composition changed after ovariectomy. After supplementing the new intestinal Lactobacillus strain to ovariectomized rats, it can significantly reduce the climacteric symptoms, and promote the integrity of the intestinal barrier by increasing the mRNA level of tight junction related markers. In addition to local use of estrogen, oral or vaginal use of probiotics in postmenopausal women is also very effective in reducing menopausal symptoms caused by GSM. This provides a new choice for improving the quality of life of postmenopausal women.
Vaginal microbial transplantation
Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has attracted more and more attention in the treatment of other diseases such as digestive system diseases, and has also achieved remarkable results. There has also been a growing interest in vaginal microbial transplantation (VMT) in recent years (Korpela et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2021). One study (Chen et al., 2021) investigated the effect of VMT on vaginal dysbiosis by establishing a vaginal dysbiosis model. The results showed that VMT significantly reduced bacterial-induced inflammation, as well as the enrichment of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and restored normal vaginal microbiota. Lev-Sagie et al. (Lev-Sagie et al., 2019) were the first to report the use of VMT from healthy donors as an alternative to the treatment of patients with BV. After 5-21 months of follow-up, patients who received VMT showed improved vaginal fluid appearance and reconstituted vaginal microbiota dominated by Lactobacilli. Huang et al. (Huang et al., 2021) transplanted the feces of female mice with intact and prolific ovaries into the feces of ovariectomized mice and found that vaginal epithelial atrophy was significantly reduced and intestinal flora was significantly altered. In contrast to the studies described above, in a randomized controlled trial (Wilson et al., 2021) the gut microbiota of infants born by caesarean section was assessed at 2 hours, 1 month and 3 months after oral administration of maternal vaginal microbes. The results showed that oral administration of maternal vaginal secretions did not alter the gut microbiota composition of early infants compared with oral placebo infants. The findings of this study question the value of vaginal vaccination.
Conclusion
There is an association between a highly diverse vaginal microbiota and female reproductive tract health. Probiotics play an important role in maintaining the health of the female reproductive tract, alleviating gynecological diseases, and enhancing the local immunity of the vagina. The use of probiotics or VMT intervention has a certain effect on preventing the progression of CIN, treating BV, and relieving symptoms related to senile vaginitis. The development of 16SrRNA sequencing technology can help to identify microbial markers and carry out personalized prevention and treatment of diseases. At present, the mechanism of action of probiotics in cervical cancer is not fully understood. In the future, it is necessary to conduct larger-scale clinical studies and longitudinal tracking. Combination immunotherapy and multi-omics analysis are also necessary to fully understand the relationship between host, vaginal microbes and disease.
Author contributions
ZM organized the literature. ZM and DL co-authored the article.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
- Abdolalipour E., Mahooti M., Salehzadeh A., Torabi A., Mohebbi S. R., Gorji A., et al. (2020). Evaluation of the antitumor immune responses of probiotic bifidobacterium bifidum in human papillomavirus-induced tumor model. Microb. Pathog. 145, 104207. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104207 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Anderson D. J., Marathe J., Pudney J. (2014). The structure of the human vaginal stratum corneum and its role in immune defense. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 71 (6), 618–623. doi: 10.1111/aji.12230 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Anukam K., Osazuwa E., Ahonkhai I., Ngwu M., Osemene G., Bruce A. W., et al. (2006). Augmentation of antimicrobial metronidazole therapy of bacterial vaginosis with oral probiotic lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 and lactobacillus reuteri RC-14: randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial. Microbes Infect. 8 (6), 1450–1454. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2006.01.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Athanasiou S., Pitsouni E., Antonopoulou S., Zacharakis D., Salvatore S., Falagas M. E., et al. (2016). The effect of microablative fractional CO2 laser on vaginal flora of postmenopausal women. Climacteric 19 (5), 512–518. doi: 10.1080/13697137.2016.1212006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bagnall P., Rizzolo D. (2017). Bacterial vaginosis: A practical review. Jaapa 30 (12), 15–21. doi: 10.1097/01.JAA.0000526770.60197.fa [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Borgogna J. C., Shardell M. D., Santori E. K., Nelson T. M., Rath J. M., Glover E. D., et al. (2020). The vaginal metabolome and microbiota of cervical HPV-positive and HPV-negative women: a cross-sectional analysis. Bjog 127 (2), 182–192. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15981 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Caretto M., Giannini A., Russo E., Simoncini T. (2017). Preventing urinary tract infections after menopause without antibiotics. Maturitas 99, 43–46. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2017.02.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cha M. K., Lee D. K., An H. M., Lee S. W., Shin S. H., Kwon J. H., et al. (2012). Antiviral activity of bifidobacterium adolescentis SPM1005-a on human papillomavirus type 16. BMC Med. 10, 72. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-72 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Champer M., Wong A. M., Champer J., Brito I. L., Messer P. W., Hou J. Y., et al. (2018). The role of the vaginal microbiome in gynaecological cancer. Bjog 125 (3), 309–315. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14631 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chao X. P., Sun T. T., Wang S., Fan Q. B., Shi H. H., Zhu L., et al. (2019). Correlation between the diversity of vaginal microbiota and the risk of high-risk human papillomavirus infection. Int. J. Gynecol Cancer 29 (1), 28–34. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2018-000032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen T., Xia C., Hu H., Wang H., Tan B., Tian P., et al. (2021). Dysbiosis of the rat vagina is efficiently rescued by vaginal microbiota transplantation or probiotic combination. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 57 (3), 106277. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2021.106277 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chitapanarux I., Chitapanarux T., Traisathit P., Kudumpee S., Tharavichitkul E., Lorvidhaya V. (2010). Randomized controlled trial of live lactobacillus acidophilus plus bifidobacterium bifidum in prophylaxis of diarrhea during radiotherapy in cervical cancer patients. Radiat. Oncol. 5, 31. doi: 10.1186/1748-717x-5-31 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Coleman J. S., Gaydos C. A. (2018). Molecular diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis: an update. J. Clin. Microbiol. 56 (9), e00342–18. doi: 10.1128/jcm.00342-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Curty G., de Carvalho P. S., Soares M. A. (2019). The role of the cervicovaginal microbiome on the genesis and as a biomarker of premalignant cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and invasive cervical cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21 (1), 222. doi: 10.3390/ijms21010222 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Das S., Bhattacharjee M. J., Mukherjee A. K., Khan M. R. (2022). Recent advances in understanding of multifaceted changes in the vaginal microenvironment: implications in vaginal health and therapeutics. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 21, 1–27. doi: 10.1080/1040841x.2022.2049696 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Delia P., Sansotta G., Donato V., Frosina P., Messina G., De Renzis C., et al. (2007). Use of probiotics for prevention of radiation-induced diarrhea. World J. Gastroenterol. 13 (6), 912–915. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i6.912 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Demers M., Dagnault A., Desjardins J. (2014). A randomized double-blind controlled trial: impact of probiotics on diarrhea in patients treated with pelvic radiation. Clin. Nutr. 33 (5), 761–767. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2013.10.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DI Pierro F., Criscuolo A. A., Dei Giudici A., Senatori R., Sesti F., Ciotti M., et al. (2021). Oral administration of lactobacillus crispatus M247 to papillomavirus-infected women: results of a preliminary, uncontrolled, open trial. Minerva Obstet Gynecol 73 (5), 621–631. doi: 10.23736/s2724-606x.21.04752-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Donders G. G. G., Ruban K., Bellen G., Grinceviciene S. (2019). Pharmacotherapy for the treatment of vaginal atrophy. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 20 (7), 821–835. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2019.1574752 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gambrell R. D., Jr. (1986). The menopause. Invest. Radiol. 21 (4), 369–378. doi: 10.1097/00004424-198604000-00017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gao W., Weng J., Gao Y., Chen X. (2013). Comparison of the vaginal microbiota diversity of women with and without human papillomavirus infection: a cross-sectional study. BMC Infect. Dis. 13, 271. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-271 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Giralt J., Regadera J. P., Verges R., Romero J., de la Fuente I., Biete A., et al. (2008). Effects of probiotic lactobacillus casei DN-114 001 in prevention of radiation-induced diarrhea: results from multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled nutritional trial. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 71 (4), 1213–1219. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.11.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Han Y., Ren Q. L. (2021). Does probiotics work for bacterial vaginosis and vulvovaginal candidiasis. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 61, 83–90. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2021.09.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hemalatha R., Mastromarino P., Ramalaxmi B. A., Balakrishna N. V., Sesikeran B. (2012). Effectiveness of vaginal tablets containing lactobacilli versus pH tablets on vaginal health and inflammatory cytokines: a randomized, double-blind study. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 31 (11), 3097–3105. doi: 10.1007/s10096-012-1671-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hombrink J., Fröhlich D., Glatzel M., Krauss A., Thiel H. J., Meier J., et al. (2000). Prevention of radiation-induced diarrhea by smectite. results of a double-blind randomized, placebo-controlled multicenter study. Strahlenther Onkol 176 (4), 173–179. doi: 10.1007/s000660050053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huang J., Shan W., Li F., Wang Z., Cheng J., Lu F., et al. (2021). Fecal microbiota transplantation mitigates vaginal atrophy in ovariectomized mice. Aging (Albany NY) 13 (5), 7589–7607. doi: 10.18632/aging.202627 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hummelen R., Changalucha J., Butamanya N. L., Cook A., Habbema J. D., Reid G. (2010). Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 and l. reuteri RC-14 to prevent or cure bacterial vaginosis among women with HIV. Int. J. Gynaecol Obstet 111 (3), 245–248. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.07.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ilhan Z. E., Łaniewski P., Thomas N., Roe D. J., Chase D. M., Herbst-Kralovetz M. M. (2019). Deciphering the complex interplay between microbiota, HPV, inflammation and cancer through cervicovaginal metabolic profiling. EBioMedicine 44, 675–690. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.04.028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jahanshahi M., Maleki Dana P., Badehnoosh B., Asemi Z., Hallajzadeh J., Mansournia M. A., et al. (2020). Anti-tumor activities of probiotics in cervical cancer. J. Ovarian Res. 13 (1), 68. doi: 10.1186/s13048-020-00668-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jang S. E., Jeong J. J., Choi S. Y., Kim H., Han M. J., Kim D. H. (2017). Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 and lactobacillus acidophilus la-14 attenuate gardnerella vaginalis-infected bacterial vaginosis in mice. Nutrients 9 (6), 531. doi: 10.3390/nu9060531 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jeng H. S., Yan T. R., Chen J. Y. (2020). Treating vaginitis with probiotics in non-pregnant females: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Exp. Ther. Med. 20 (4), 3749–3765. doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.9090 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kandati K., Belagal P., Nannepaga J. S., Viswanath B. (2022). Role of probiotics in the management of cervical cancer: An update. Clin. Nutr. ESPEN 48, 5–16. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2022.02.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Komatsu A., Igimi S., Kawana K. (2018). Optimization of human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16 E7-expressing lactobacillus-based vaccine for induction of mucosal E7-specific IFNγ-producing cells. Vaccine 36 (24), 3423–3426. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.05.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Korpela K., Helve O., Kolho K. L., Saisto T., Skogberg K., Dikareva E., et al. (2020). Maternal fecal microbiota transplantation in cesarean-born infants rapidly restores normal gut microbial development: A proof-of-Concept study. Cell 183 (2), 324–334.e325. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.08.047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kovachev S. M. (2020). Cervical cancer and vaginal microbiota changes. Arch. Microbiol. 202 (2), 323–327. doi: 10.1007/s00203-019-01747-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Langner C. A., Ortiz A. M., Flynn J. K., Kendall H., Lagenaur L. A., Brenchley J. M. (2021). The vaginal microbiome of nonhuman primates can be only transiently altered to become lactobacillus dominant without reducing inflammation. Microbiol. Spectr. 9 (3), e0107421. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.01074-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Łaniewski P., Ilhan Z. E., Herbst-Kralovetz M. M. (2020). The microbiome and gynaecological cancer development, prevention and therapy. Nat. Rev. Urol 17 (4), 232–250. doi: 10.1038/s41585-020-0286-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Laue C., Papazova E., Liesegang A., Pannenbeckers A., Arendarski P., Linnerth B., et al. (2018). Effect of a yoghurt drink containing lactobacillus strains on bacterial vaginosis in women - a double-blind, randomised, controlled clinical pilot trial. Benef Microbes 9 (1), 35–50. doi: 10.3920/bm2017.0018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lev-Sagie A., Goldman-Wohl D., Cohen Y., Dori-Bachash M., Leshem A., Mor U., et al. (2019). Vaginal microbiome transplantation in women with intractable bacterial vaginosis. Nat. Med. 25 (10), 1500–1504. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0600-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lim E. Y., Song E. J., Kim J. G., Jung S. Y., Lee S. Y., Shin H. S., et al. (2021). Lactobacillus intestinalis YT2 restores the gut microbiota and improves menopausal symptoms in ovariectomized rats. Benef Microbes 12 (5), 503–516. doi: 10.3920/bm2020.0217 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ling Z., Liu X., Chen W., Luo Y., Yuan L., Xia Y., et al. (2013). The restoration of the vaginal microbiota after treatment for bacterial vaginosis with metronidazole or probiotics. Microb. Ecol. 65 (3), 773–780. doi: 10.1007/s00248-012-0154-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Linn Y. H., Thu K. K., Win N. H. H. (2019). Effect of probiotics for the prevention of acute radiation-induced diarrhoea among cervical cancer patients: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 11 (2), 638–647. doi: 10.1007/s12602-018-9408-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu J., Luo M., Zhang Y., Cao G., Wang S. (2020). Association of high-risk human papillomavirus infection duration and cervical lesions with vaginal microbiota composition. Ann. Transl. Med. 8 (18), 1161. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-5832 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu H. F., Yi N. (2022). A systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy of probiotics for bacterial vaginosis. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 26 (1), 90–98. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202201_27752 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li X., Wang H., Du X., Yu W., Jiang J., Geng Y., et al. (2017). Lactobacilli inhibit cervical cancer cell migration in vitro and reduce tumor burden in vivo through upregulation of e-cadherin. Oncol. Rep. 38 (3), 1561–1568. doi: 10.3892/or.2017.5791 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li Y., Yu T., Yan H., Li D., Yu T., Yuan T., et al. (2020). Vaginal microbiota and HPV infection: Novel mechanistic insights and therapeutic strategies. Infect. Drug Resist. 13, 1213–1220. doi: 10.2147/idr.s210615 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mastromarino P., Macchia S., Meggiorini L., Trinchieri V., Mosca L., Perluigi M., et al. (2009). Effectiveness of lactobacillus-containing vaginal tablets in the treatment of symptomatic bacterial vaginosis. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 15 (1), 67–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.02112.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Medina-Contreras O., Luvián-Morales J., Valdez-Palomares F., Flores-Cisneros L., Sánchez-López M. S., Soto-Lugo J. H., et al. (2020). IMMUNONUTRITION IN CERVICAL CANCER: IMMUNE RESPONSE MODULATION BY DIET. Rev. Invest. Clin. 72 (4), 219–230. doi: 10.24875/ric.20000062 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mitra A., MacIntyre D. A., Lee Y. S., Smith A., Marchesi J. R., Lehne B., et al. (2015). Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia disease progression is associated with increased vaginal microbiome diversity. Sci. Rep. 5, 16865. doi: 10.1038/srep16865 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mitra A., MacIntyre D. A., Ntritsos G., Smith A., Tsilidis K. K., Marchesi J. R., et al. (2020). The vaginal microbiota associates with the regression of untreated cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 lesions. Nat. Commun. 11 (1), 1999. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15856-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Motevaseli E., Azam R., Akrami S. M., Mazlomy M., Saffari M., Modarressi M. H., et al. (2016). The effect of lactobacillus crispatus and lactobacillus rhamnosusCulture supernatants on expression of autophagy genes and HPV E6 and E7 oncogenes in the HeLa cell line. Cell J. 17 (4), 601–607. doi: 10.22074/cellj.2016.3833 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Motevaseli E., Shirzad M., Akrami S. M., Mousavi A. S., Mirsalehian A., Modarressi M. H. (2013). Normal and tumour cervical cells respond differently to vaginal lactobacilli, independent of pH and lactate. J. Med. Microbiol. 62 (Pt 7), 1065–1072. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.057521-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Muzny C. A., Łaniewski P., Schwebke J. R., Herbst-Kralovetz M. M. (2020). Host-vaginal microbiota interactions in the pathogenesis of bacterial vaginosis. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 33 (1), 59–65. doi: 10.1097/qco.0000000000000620 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nami Y., Abdullah N., Haghshenas B., Radiah D., Rosli R., Khosroushahi A. Y. (2014). Assessment of probiotic potential and anticancer activity of newly isolated vaginal bacterium lactobacillus plantarum 5BL. Microbiol. Immunol. 58 (9), 492–502. doi: 10.1111/1348-0421.12175 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Negi D., Singh A., Joshi N., Mishra N. (2020). Cisplatin and probiotic biomass loaded pessaries for the management of cervical cancer. Anticancer Agents Med. Chem. 20 (5), 589–598. doi: 10.2174/1871520619666191211110640 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Niu X. X., Li T., Zhang X., Wang S. X., Liu Z. H. (2017). Lactobacillus crispatus modulates vaginal epithelial cell innate response to candida albicans. Chin. Med. J. (Engl) 130 (3), 273–279. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.198927 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nouri Z., Karami F., Neyazi N., Modarressi M. H., Karimi R., Khorramizadeh M. R., et al. (2016). Dual anti-metastatic and anti-proliferative activity assessment of two probiotics on HeLa and HT-29 cell lines. Cell J. 18 (2), 127–134. doi: 10.22074/cellj.2016.4307 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Okawa T., Niibe H., Arai T., Sekiba K., Noda K., Takeuchi S., et al. (1993). Effect of LC9018 combined with radiation therapy on carcinoma of the uterine cervix. a phase III, multicenter, randomized, controlled study. Cancer 72 (6), 1949–1954. doi: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Onderdonk A. B., Delaney M. L., Fichorova R. N. (2016). The human microbiome during bacterial vaginosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 29 (2), 223–238. doi: 10.1128/cmr.00075-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Park Y. C., Ouh Y. T., Sung M. H., Park H. G., Kim T. J., Cho C. H., et al. (2019). A phase 1/2a, dose-escalation, safety and preliminary efficacy study of oral therapeutic vaccine in subjects with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3. J. Gynecol Oncol. 30 (6), e88. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e88 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Petricevic L., Unger F. M., Viernstein H., Kiss H. (2008). Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of oral lactobacilli to improve the vaginal flora of postmenopausal women. Eur. J. Obstet Gynecol Reprod. Biol. 141 (1), 54–57. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.06.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Piccioni A., Franza L., Vaccaro V., Saviano A., Zanza C., Candelli M., et al. (2021). Microbiota and probiotics: The role of limosilactobacillus reuteri in diverticulitis. Medicina (Kaunas) 57 (8), 802. doi: 10.3390/medicina57080802 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pourmollaei S., Barzegari A., Farshbaf-Khalili A., Nouri M., Fattahi A., Shahnazi M., et al. (2020). Anticancer effect of bacteria on cervical cancer: Molecular aspects and therapeutic implications. Life Sci. 246, 117413. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.117413 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pramanick R., Mayadeo N., Warke H., Begum S., Aich P., Aranha C. (2019). Vaginal microbiota of asymptomatic bacterial vaginosis and vulvovaginal candidiasis: Are they different from normal microbiota? Microb. Pathog. 134, 103599. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2019.103599 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Qiu G., Yu Y., Wang Y., Wang X. (2019). The significance of probiotics in preventing radiotherapy-induced diarrhea in patients with cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Surg. 65, 61–69. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.03.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Recine N., Palma E., Domenici L., Giorgini M., Imperiale L., Sassu C., et al. (2016). Restoring vaginal microbiota: biological control of bacterial vaginosis. a prospective case-control study using lactobacillus rhamnosus BMX 54 as adjuvant treatment against bacterial vaginosis. Arch. Gynecol Obstet 293 (1), 101–107. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3810-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reznichenko H., Henyk N., Maliuk V., Khyzhnyak T., Tynna Y., Filipiuk I., et al. (2020). Oral intake of lactobacilli can be helpful in symptomatic bacterial vaginosis: A randomized clinical study. J. Low Genit Tract Dis. 24 (3), 284–289. doi: 10.1097/lgt.0000000000000518 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Riaz Rajoka M. S., Zhao H., Lu Y., Lian Z., Li N., Hussain N., et al. (2018). Anticancer potential against cervix cancer (HeLa) cell line of probiotic lactobacillus casei and lactobacillus paracasei strains isolated from human breast milk. Food Funct. 9 (5), 2705–2715. doi: 10.1039/c8fo00547h [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ribeiro A. E., Monteiro N. E. S., Moraes A. V. G., Costa-Paiva L. H., Pedro A. O. (2018). Can the use of probiotics in association with isoflavone improve the symptoms of genitourinary syndrome of menopause? results from a randomized controlled trial. Menopause 26 (6), 643–652. doi: 10.1097/gme.0000000000001279 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Russo R., Karadja E., De Seta F. (2019). Evidence-based mixture containing lactobacillus strains and lactoferrin to prevent recurrent bacterial vaginosis: a double blind, placebo controlled, randomised clinical trial. Benef Microbes 10 (1), 19–26. doi: 10.3920/bm2018.0075 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saraf V. S., Sheikh S. A., Ahmad A., Gillevet P. M., Bokhari H., Javed S. (2021). Vaginal microbiome: normalcy vs dysbiosis. Arch. Microbiol. 203 (7), 3793–3802. doi: 10.1007/s00203-021-02414-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Selis N. N., Oliveira H. B. M., Souza C. L. S., Almeida J. B., Andrade Y., Silva L. S. C., et al. (2021). Lactobacillus plantarum Lp62 exerts probiotic effects against gardnerella vaginalis ATCC 49154 in bacterial vaginosis. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 73 (5), 579–589. doi: 10.1111/lam.13547 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sungur T., Aslim B., Karaaslan C., Aktas B. (2017). Impact of exopolysaccharides (EPSs) of lactobacillus gasseri strains isolated from human vagina on cervical tumor cells (HeLa). Anaerobe 47, 137–144. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2017.05.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Taghinezhad S. S., Keyvani H., Bermúdez-Humarán L. G., Donders G. G. G., Fu X., Mohseni A. H. (2021). Twenty years of research on HPV vaccines based on genetically modified lactic acid bacteria: an overview on the gut-vagina axis. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 78 (4), 1191–1206. doi: 10.1007/s00018-020-03652-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang J., Li Z., Ma X., Du L., Jia Z., Cui X., et al. (2021). Translocation of vaginal microbiota is involved in impairment and protection of uterine health. Nat. Commun. 12 (1), 4191. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24516-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang H., Ma Y., Li R., Chen X., Wan L., Zhao W. (2019). Associations of cervicovaginal lactobacilli with high-risk human papillomavirus infection, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, and cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Infect. Dis. 220 (8), 1243–1254. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiz325 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang K. D., Xu D. J., Wang B. Y., Yan D. H., Lv Z., Su J. R. (2018). Inhibitory effect of vaginal lactobacillus supernatants on cervical cancer cells. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 10 (2), 236–242. doi: 10.1007/s12602-017-9339-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wei Z. T., Chen H. L., Wang C. F., Yang G. L., Han S. M., Zhang S. L. (2020). Depiction of vaginal microbiota in women with high-risk human papillomavirus infection. Front. Public Health 8. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.587298 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Werner J., Decarlo C. A., Escott N., Zehbe I., Ulanova M. (2012). Expression of integrins and toll-like receptors in cervical cancer: effect of infectious agents. Innate Immun. 18 (1), 55–69. doi: 10.1177/1753425910392934 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilson B. C., Butler É M., Grigg C. P., Derraik J. G. B., Chiavaroli V., Walker N., et al. (2021). Oral administration of maternal vaginal microbes at birth to restore gut microbiome development in infants born by caesarean section: A pilot randomised placebo-controlled trial. EBioMedicine 69, 103443. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103443 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xie Y., Feng Y., Li W., Zhan F., Huang G., Hu H., et al. (2020). Revealing the disturbed vaginal micobiota caused by cervical cancer using high-throughput sequencing technology. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 10. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.538336 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yoo S. H., Kim K. R., Park N. J. (2022). Transitional cell metaplasia of the uterine cervix: A histopathological and immunohistochemical analysis suggesting a possible role of androgenic conversion during urothelial-like differentiation in peri/postmenopausal women. Ann. Diagn. Pathol. 56, 151839. doi: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2021.151839 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Z., Li T., Zhang D., Zong X., Bai H., Bi H., et al. (2021). Distinction between vaginal and cervical microbiota in high-risk human papilloma virus-infected women in China. BMC Microbiol. 21 (1), 90. doi: 10.1186/s12866-021-02152-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]