Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 28;13:913424. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.913424

Table 4C.

Influence of complicated allergy.

tIgE(KU/L) CSMS without omalizumab CSMS with omalizumab CSMS improvement Recovery rate1
Mould allergy
Without mould allergy (n=31) 162.0[104.1,448.0] 2.67[1.00,3.00] 1.00[0.17,2.00] 2.54 ± 1.27 7(22.6%)
Complicated with mould allergy (n=7) 153.0[119.0,183.0] 2.67[2.00,2.83] 0.83[0.33,1.83] 2.69 ± 1.22 1(14.3%)
P-value 0.907 0.825 0.854 0.789 1.000
Dust mite allergy
Without dust mite allergy (n=34) 158.0[99.1,398.5] 2.67[1.00,3.00] 0.92[0.13,1.87] 2.69 ± 1.44 8(23.5%)
Complicated with dust mite allergy (n=5) 197.0[136.5,1065.5] 0.92[0.83,2.50] 0.17[0.00,0.50] 3.67 ± 1.10 2(40.0%)
P-value 0.218 0.581 0.334 0.255 0.587
Number of autumn pollen allergen
Single allergen (n=14) 115.5[58.4,274.5] 3.00[2.83,4.21] 0.33[0.00,2.00] 2.63 ± 0.29 5(35.7%)
Multiple allergen (n=50) 162.0[104.0,435.0] 4.50[3.00,5.00] 0.83[0.00,1.83] 2.79 ± 0.22 14(28.0%)
P-value 0.138 0.095 0.323 0.676 1.000