Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 27;7(31):27062–27078. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c02909

Table 1. Data of Wastewater Treatment Processes using TiO2/Biochar Systems.

material feedstock pyrolysis temp (°C) surface area (m2/g) pollution initial pollution concentration (mg/dm3) applied dose (g/dm3) adsorption capacity (mg/g) degradation method removal eficiency (%) ref
TiO2/biochar hemp stem 500 17.4 ammonia nitrogen 100 0.03   catalysis (UV) ∼99.0 (30)
TiO2/CuO/biochar hemp stem 500   ammonia nitrogen 100 0.03   catalysis (UV) 99.7 (30)
TiO2/biochar Daphnia magna 325 383.0 sulfamethoxazole 10 5.00 2.2 adsorption + photocatalytic oxidation (UV) 91.0 (18)
TiO2/biochar reed straw 300 102.2 sulfamethoxazole 10 1.25 6.6 adsorption + photocatalysis (UV) 91.3 (31)
Zn/TiO2/biochar reed straw 500 169.2 sulfamethoxazole 10 1.25 8.0 adsorption + photocatalysis (Vis) 80.8 (25)
TiO2/biochar paper sludge and wheat husks   26.3 Reactive Blue 69 20 1.50   sonocatalysis (UV) 98.1 (32)
TiO2/biochar macroalgae 650   Methylene Blue 5 2.00 2.2 adsorption + photocatalysis (Vis) 99.0 (33)
TiO2/Fe/Fe3C/biochar dewatered sewage sludge 800 50.3 Methylene Blue 200 1.00   adsorption + photodegradation (UV) 89.2 (19)
Fe2O3/TiO2/biochar waste tea leaves 500 244.8 Methylene Blue 200 2.00   Fenton catalysis (Vis) 75.0 (11)
        Rhodamine B         60.0  
        Methyl Orange         40.0  
TiO2/biochar walnut shells 500   Methyl Orange 20 0.25   photocatalytic oxidation (UV) 96.9 (34)
Ag/TiO2/biochar walnut shells 700 35.2 Methyl Orange 20 0.25   catalysis (UV) 97.5 (26)
TiO2/biochar Salvinia molesta 350 8.6 Acid Orange 7 20 0.10   photocatalysis (UV) 90.0 (35)
Fe/TiO2/biochar rosin 800   Cr(VI) 150 0.80 77.2 adsorption 38.1 (36)
TiO2/biochar raw corn cob 550 450.4 Cd(II) 50–300 1.00 72.6 adsorption 70.0 (37)
        As(V)     118.1