Skip to main content
. 2021 May 19;101(5):705. doi: 10.2340/00015555-3821

Table II.

Selected characteristics of new detected cases of leprosy in Shanghai between 2000 and 2019

Characteristics Total (n = 145) Resident patients (n = 16) Migrant patients (n = 129) p-value*
Sex, n (%) 0.762
 Male 108 (74.5) 13 (81.2) 95 (73.6)
 Female 37 (25.5) 3 (18.8) 34 (26.4)
Age at diagnosis, n (%) < 0.001
 ≤ 20 years 2 (1.4) 1 (6.2) 1 (0.8)
 21–40 years 95 (65.5) 3 (18.8) 92 (71.3)
 41–60 years 39 (26.9) 11 (68.8) 28 (21.7)
 > 60 years 9 (6.2) 1 (6.2) 8 (6.2)
Exposure history to leprosy, n (%) 0.638
 Yes 13 (9.0) 2 (12.5) 11 (8.5)
 No 132 (91.0) 14 (87.5) 118 (91.5)
Type of leprosy, n (%) 0.489
 Multibacillary 119 (82.1) 12 (75.0) 107 (82.9)
 Paucibacillary 26 (17.9) 4 (25.0) 22 (17.1)
Ridley and Jopling classification of leprosy, n (%) 0.209
 TT 4 (2.8) 1 (6.2) 3 (2.3)
 BT 31 (21.4) 3 (18.8) 28 (21.7)
 BB 20 (13.8) 4 (25.0) 16 (12.4)
 BL 55 (37.9) 3 (18.8) 52 (40.3)
 LL 35 (24.1) 5 (31.2) 30 (23.3)
Leprosy reactions, n (%) 0.662
 Type 1 29 (20.0) 4 (25.0) 21 (16.3)
 Type 2 19 (13.1) 2 (12.5) 19 (14.7)
 No reactions 97 (66.9) 10 (62.5) 89 (69.0)
Grade 2 disabilitya, n (%) 0.523
 Yes 31 (21.4) 2 (12.5) 29 (22.5)
 No 114 (78.6) 14 (87.5) 100 (77.5)
Lag time from onset of symptom to diagnosis, months, mean (range) 23.8 (1–112) 10.8 (1–46) 25.4 (2–112) < 0.001
Lag time from first visit to diagnosis, months, mean (range) 21.7 (0–92) 9.4 (0–35) 23.2 (0–92) < 0.001
Documented misdiagnosis, n (%) 0.638
 Yes 132 (91.0) 14 (87.5) 118 (91.5)
 No 13 (9.0) 2 (12.5) 11 (8.5)
a

Leprosy disability grades (GD) in terms of the standard of the sixth leprosy experts committee of the World Health Organization (WHO) (1988).

*

Variables were compared between resident patients and migrant patients.

TT: tuberculosis leprosy; BT: borderline tuberculoid leprosy; BB: borderline leprosy; BL: borderline lepromatous leprosy; LL: lepromatous leprosy.