Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 10;22:1529. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13922-2

Table 2.

Risk behaviours associated with HIV/HCV Co-infection among PWID

Author/Year Geographical location No. of participants/Age Study Design Sampling strategy Population Characteristics HIV /HCV Coinfection Sociodemographic factors Injecting risk factors Sexual risk factors Study Strengths Study Limitations Quality Assessment Score
Ray Saraswati et al. (2015) [30] Delhi

n = 3792

Aged 18 years and above

Longitudinal cohort study Mapping exercise of hot spot area was done and participants were recruited through peer-referral and targeted outreach by outreach workers Injecting in the past 3 months of data collection Male- 449 Older age, illiterate, never married, Hindu religion, living at home with family or either living on the street, geographical location Longer duration of injection (2-5yrs), a greater number of days injected in the past month (21–30 days), sharing needles/syringe, sharing of injecting equipment, using syringe filled by someone else Not sexually active in the last 3 months Large sample size which allowed for examining sociodemographic, injecting and sexual characteristics associated with strong statistical power and analysis and minimal recall bias

-Just two-thirds of participants returned for follow up

-Low female participants hence they were removed from statistical analysis

8
Kermode et al. (2014) Manipur

n = 821

Aged 18 years and above

Cross-sectional study Respondent driven sampling Injecting at least once in the past 6 months of data collection Male- 241 Older age ≥ 30 yrs, illiterate, widowed, divorced or separated, being employed Earlier age of first injection, longer duration of injecting, injecting at least once daily, sharing of injecting equipment, sharing of needle/syringe - RDS was used to recruit study participants

-Not possible to infer causation for outcome variables due to the nature of the study design

- Social acceptability bias may have contributed to an under-estimate in the prevalence of unsafe injecting behaviour

10
Mahanta et al. (2008) [9] Nagaland and Mizoram

n = 398

Aged 15 years and over

Cross-sectional study PWID who attended drop-in centers within a given time period were randomly recruited for the study Injecting within past 6 months of data collection Male- 34 Older age ≥ 25 yrs, male gender, married Use of heroin, longer duration of injecting, sharing injection containers - Pre-tested, pre-validated structured questionnaire was used

-Due to the random recruitment strategy the study findings are not representative of the PWID population of Nagaland and Mizoram

-Temporality could not be established due to the cross-sectional nature of the study