Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 10;22:341. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02366-0

Table 3.

Quality assessment according to Newcastle–Ottawa of the included studies (n = 18)

References Selection Comparability Outcome Stars
Representativeness of the sample Sample size Non-respondents Ascertainment of the exposure Control for confounders Assessment of the outcome Statistical test
Vitek et al. [35] b b c a** c b** b 4*
Manzano et al. [36] c a* c a** c b** c 5*
DeMattei et al. [37] c b c a** c b** c 4*
Luppanapornlarp et al. [38] c b c a** ab** b** a* 7*
Soni et al. [39] c b c c c a** c 2*
Orellana et al. [40] c b c c b* b** b 3*
Rekha et al. [41] c b c a** c b** c 4*
Muppa et al. [42] c b c c c b** c 2*
Vellappally et al. [43] c b c a** c a** c 4*
Du et al. [44] c b c c b* b** b 3*
Alkhadra [45] c b c a** c b** c 4*
Fontaine-Sylvestre et al. [46] c b c a** ab** b** a* 7*
Alkhabuli et al. [47] c b c a** c b** c 4*
Kuter and Guler [48] b* b c c b* b** b 4*
Leiva-Garcia et al. [49] c b c a** b* b** b 5*
Orellana et al. [50] c b c c c a** c 2*
Mangione et al. [51] c b c a** c b** c 4*
Bagattoni et al. [52] c b c a** c b** c 4*