Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 7;28(29):3960–3970. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i29.3960

Table 4.

Subgroup analyses of the models in single-positive patients


Rad-score 1
Rad-score 2
P value
Subgroups
AUC
SEN (%)
SPE (%)
AUC
SEN (%)
SPE (%)

nCRT
With (n = 77) 0.740 (95%CI: 0.628-0.833) 73.5% 74.4% 0.897 (95%CI: 0.806-0.954) 73.5% 90.7% 0.014
Without (n = 127) 0.753 (95%CI: 0.668-0.825) 60% 86.1% 0.957 (95%CI: 0.905-0.985) 89.1% 93.1% < 0.001
Location
Mid-low (n = 139) 0.782 (95%CI: 0.704-0.848) 75.4% 62.2% 0.931 (95%CI: 0.875-0.967) 86.2% 82.4% < 0.001
High (n = 65) 0.643 (95%CI: 0.515-0.758) 54.2% 73.2% 0.941 (95%CI: 0.853-0.984) 83.3% 85.4% < 0.001
Number of TDs 1-2 (n = 50) ≥ 3 (n = 39) P = 0.838 1-2 (n = 50) ≥ 3 (n = 39) P = 0.309
Value 0.64 ± 0.24 0.65 ± 0.22 0.83 ± 0.22 0.77 ± 0.26

Rad-score 1: Rad-score of the main tumor; Rad-score 2: Rad-score of the largest peritumoral nodule; TDs: Tumor deposits; AUC: Area under the curve; SEN: Sensitivity; SPE: Specificity; nCRT: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.