Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 3;14(15):3780. doi: 10.3390/cancers14153780

Table 1.

Histopathologically related machine learning models used for clinical applications in GI cancers. Machine learning algorithms and models are grouped according to their specific computational task and GI cancer type to compare their performance and clinical application. The sources of the datasets and sample sizes are also summarized.

Author Task Cancer Type Type of WSI Dataset Algorithm/
Model
Performance Clinical
Application
Yoshida et al. [24] Classification Gastric cancer H&E Training and testing: 3062 WSIs e-Pathologist Positive for carcinoma or suspicion of carcinoma vs. caution for adenoma or suspicion of a neoplastic lesion vs. negative for a neoplastic lesion
Overall concordance rate: 55.6%
Kappa coefficient: 0.28 (95% CI: 0.26–0.30)
Negative vs. non-negative
Sensitivity: 89.5% (95% CI: 87.5–91.4%)
Specificity: 50.7% (95% CI: 48.5–52.9%)
Positive predictive value: 47.7% (95% CI: 45.4–49.9%)
Negative predictive value: 90.6% (95% CI, 88.8–92.2%)
Differentiation and diagnosis gastric cancer grade
Yasuda et al. [25] Classification Gastric cancer H&E Training and testing: 66 WSIs wndchrm Noncancer vs. well-differentiated gastric cancer
AUC: 0.99
Noncancer vs. moderately differentiated gastric cancer
AUC: 0.98
Noncancer vs. poorly differentiated gastric cancer
AUC: 0.99
Differentiation and diagnosis gastric cancer grade
Jiang et al. [106] Classification and prognosis Gastric cancer H&E Training: 251 patients
Internal validation: 248 patients
External validation: 287 patients
Support vector machine Patients might benefit more from postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy vs. patient might not postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy
training cohort:
5-year overall survival AUC: 0.796
5-year disease-free survival AUC: 0.805
Internal validation cohort:
5-year overall survival AUC: 0.809
5-year disease-free survival AUC: 0.813
External validation cohort:
5-year overall survival AUC: 0.834
5-year disease-free survival AUC: 0.828
Prognosis of gastric cancer patients and identification of patients who might benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy
Cosatto et al. [26] Detection Gastric cancer H&E Training set: 8558 patients
Test set: 4168 patients
Semi-supervised multi-instance learning framework Positive vs. negative
AUC: 0.96
Detection of gastric cancer
Jiang et al. [27] Classification Colon cancer H&E Training: 101 patients
Internal validation: 67 patients
External validation: 47 patients
InceptionResNetV2 + gradient-boosting decision tree machine classifier High-risk recurrence vs. low-risk recurrence
Internal validation hazard ratio: 8.9766 (95% CI: 2.824–28.528)
External validation hazard ratio: 10.273 (95% CI: 2.177–48.472)
Poor vs. good prognosis groups:
Internal validation hazard ratio: 10.687 (95% CI: 2.908–39.272)
External validation hazard ratio: 5.033 (95% CI: 1.792–14.132)
Prognosis of stage III colon cancer

WSI = whole-slide imaging; H&E = haematoxylin and eosin; CI= confidence interval; AUC = area under the curve; wndchrm = weighted neighbour distance using compound hierarchy of algorithms representing morphology.