Table 1.
Author | Task | Cancer Type | Type of WSI | Dataset | Algorithm/ Model |
Performance | Clinical Application |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yoshida et al. [24] | Classification | Gastric cancer | H&E | Training and testing: 3062 WSIs | e-Pathologist | Positive for carcinoma or suspicion of carcinoma vs. caution for adenoma or suspicion of a neoplastic lesion vs. negative for a neoplastic lesion Overall concordance rate: 55.6% Kappa coefficient: 0.28 (95% CI: 0.26–0.30) Negative vs. non-negative Sensitivity: 89.5% (95% CI: 87.5–91.4%) Specificity: 50.7% (95% CI: 48.5–52.9%) Positive predictive value: 47.7% (95% CI: 45.4–49.9%) Negative predictive value: 90.6% (95% CI, 88.8–92.2%) |
Differentiation and diagnosis gastric cancer grade |
Yasuda et al. [25] | Classification | Gastric cancer | H&E | Training and testing: 66 WSIs | wndchrm | Noncancer vs. well-differentiated gastric cancer AUC: 0.99 Noncancer vs. moderately differentiated gastric cancer AUC: 0.98 Noncancer vs. poorly differentiated gastric cancer AUC: 0.99 |
Differentiation and diagnosis gastric cancer grade |
Jiang et al. [106] | Classification and prognosis | Gastric cancer | H&E | Training: 251 patients Internal validation: 248 patients External validation: 287 patients |
Support vector machine | Patients might benefit more from postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy vs. patient might not postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy training cohort: 5-year overall survival AUC: 0.796 5-year disease-free survival AUC: 0.805 Internal validation cohort: 5-year overall survival AUC: 0.809 5-year disease-free survival AUC: 0.813 External validation cohort: 5-year overall survival AUC: 0.834 5-year disease-free survival AUC: 0.828 |
Prognosis of gastric cancer patients and identification of patients who might benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy |
Cosatto et al. [26] | Detection | Gastric cancer | H&E | Training set: 8558 patients Test set: 4168 patients |
Semi-supervised multi-instance learning framework | Positive vs. negative AUC: 0.96 |
Detection of gastric cancer |
Jiang et al. [27] | Classification | Colon cancer | H&E | Training: 101 patients Internal validation: 67 patients External validation: 47 patients |
InceptionResNetV2 + gradient-boosting decision tree machine classifier | High-risk recurrence vs. low-risk recurrence Internal validation hazard ratio: 8.9766 (95% CI: 2.824–28.528) External validation hazard ratio: 10.273 (95% CI: 2.177–48.472) Poor vs. good prognosis groups: Internal validation hazard ratio: 10.687 (95% CI: 2.908–39.272) External validation hazard ratio: 5.033 (95% CI: 1.792–14.132) |
Prognosis of stage III colon cancer |
WSI = whole-slide imaging; H&E = haematoxylin and eosin; CI= confidence interval; AUC = area under the curve; wndchrm = weighted neighbour distance using compound hierarchy of algorithms representing morphology.