|
Location
|
Cornelius et al., 2013 [12] |
|
Garzon-Muvdi et al., 2020 [5] |
|
Yuzawa et al., 2016 [13] Jungwirth et al., 2019 [14] |
Higher frequency of NF2, TRAF7, AKT1, KLF4, SMO, and PI1K3CA mutations
Loss of chromosomes 22q (89%) and 1p (44%) and NF2 mutation (44%) in IVMs
|
Yeung et al., 2021 [15] Terabe et al., 2021 [16] |
|
Zador et al., 2020 [17] Kosugi et al., 2019 [18] |
Gamma-delta T cells, monocytes, and plasma cells dominant in SBMs
Mast cells and neutrophils overexpressed in convexity meningiomas
TILs, Treg, HIF-1α, VEGF-A, VEGFRs-1 & 2, TAMs significantly lower in CS
|
Savardekar et al., 2018 [19] |
|
|
Immunogenetics
|
Al-Rashed, et al., 2020 [20] |
Increasing meningioma grade associated with increased VEGF, Ki67, TOP2, PD-1, and PDGFRB
Cytostatic mTOR inhibitors promising in controlling tumor growth
Inhibition of EZH2 potentially improve outcomes
|
Goutagny et al., 2010 [21] |
NF2 loss associated with chromosome instability
Most grade I meningiomas do not progress to a higher grade and are characterized by very few chromosome alterations, mainly isolated 22q loss
|
Brastianos et al., 2013 [22] |
|
Strickland et al., 2016 [23] |
Mutation rates at high frequency for SMO (11%) and AKT1 (19%) in both WHO Grade I and Grade II anterior skull base meningiomas
Genotyping of SMO and AKT1 is likely to be high yield in anterior skull base meningiomas with available surgical tissue
|
Bi et al., 2016 [24] |
Recurrent somatic mutations in NF2, TRAF7, KLF4, AKT1, SMO, and PIK3CA are collectively present in ~80% of sporadic meningiomas
The recent identification of AKT1, SMO, and PIK3CA mutations opens the door for targeted pharmacotherapeutics in ~20% of grade I meningiomas.
|
Hao et al., 2019 [25] |
KLF4- and TRAF7-mutated tumors were predominantly secretory skull base meningiomas
SMO-mutated tumors exhibited higher calcification, and half of these tumors were observed in the brain midline
TRAF7 mutations could play a key role in skull base meningiomas by regulating the expression of inhibitory immune checkpoints and suppressing immune responses
|
Karimi et al., 2020 [26] |
A significantly positive relationship between higher PD-L1 expression and grading is shown
PD-L1 expression levels represent an independent prognostic factor to predict tumor recurrence
Hypoxia is one of the potential regulatory mechanisms for PD-L1 expression in meningioma
|
Williams et al., 2019 [27] |
A large subset of posterior fossa meningiomas (foramen magnum) harbor AKT1 E17K mutations and are therefore potentially amenable to targeted medical therapy
In contrast to AKT1 mutations, SMO or PIK3CA mutations were absent in the posterior fossa
|
Mei et al., 2017 [28] |
OGN contribute to meningioma cell growth through interaction with NF2, AKT, and mTOR
OGN downregulate NF2, the canonical tumor suppressor altered in approximately half of meningiomas
AKT inhibition reduces OGN protein levels in meningioma cells, with a concomitant increase in cell death
|
Kerr et al., 2018 [29] |
Combining histology, genetics, epigenetics, and clinical findings will provide the best system for classification
Increased risk of meningioma: NF2, nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome, multiple endocrine neoplasia 1 (MEN1), Cowden syndrome, Werner syndrome, BAP1 tumor predisposition syndrome, Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome, and familial meningiomatosis caused by germline mutations in the SMARCB1 and SMARCE1 genes
|
|
Immunotherapy
|
Garzon-Muvdi et al., 2020 [5] |
Role of VEGF in meningioma pathogenesis, and its expression correlates with tumor grade, peritumoral edema, and necrosis
Receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors that target PDGF and EFG in clinical trial
Grade III meningiomas showed increased MDSCs that overexpress PD-L1, corroborating the hypothesis of the systemic immunosuppression
Utilization of monoclonal antibodies targeting PD1/PDL1
CAR-T cells show potential effects on immunosuppression in tumor microenvironment
Promising clinical trials testing CAR-T therapy, especially for refractory meningiomas
|
Wen et al., 2010 [30] |
Specific chemotherapeutic agents (doxorubicin, irinotecan, vincristine, and temozolomide) not effective in improving PSF for HGMs
|
Scerrati et al., 2020 [31] |
|
Garzon-Muvdi et al., 2020 [5] Domingues et al., 2012 [32] Pinton et al., 2018 [33] |
|
Garzon-Muvdi et al., 2020 [5] Arasanz et al., 2017 [34] |
The use of immunotherapy could become an alternative for HGMs over the limits of the conventional therapy
The target is the immunosuppressive microenvironment
PD-L1 is expressed on the surface of tumor cells, and it inhibits T-cell activation by binding to the PD-1 receptor on T- and B-cells. It is one of the major mechanisms used by meningiomas to evade the host immune system
|
Proctor et al., 2019 [8] Flem-Karlsen et al., 2018 [35] Han et al., 2016 [36] |
PD-L2 (receptor for PD-1), B7-H3, CTLA-4, and NY-ESO-1 were highly in meningiomas, and in patients who carry genetic mutations in PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway
PD-L2 is overexpressed throughout all meningioma grades, and it has been presumed to play a role as a predictor for immunotherapy response
CTLA-4 were highly in patients with carry genetic mutations in PIK3CA or SMO
Clinical trials for the use of PD-1 blockade immunotherapy (Nivolumab, Avelumab, Pembrolizumab), comparing with anti-CTLA4 antibody (Ipilimumab)
|
Thomas et al., 2018 [37] |
|
Giles et al., 2019 [38] |
|
|
Immune cells infiltrate
|
Giles et al., 2019 [38] |
|
Garzon-Muvdi et al., 2020 [5] Proctor et al., 2019 [8] Pinton et al., 2018 [33] Proctor et al., 2019 [8] Han et al., 2016 [36] Rossi et al., 1988 [39] |
Higher B7- H3, and PD-L2 l in patients with PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway mutations
Higher CTLA-4 in PIK3CA or SMO mutations.
Higher expression of PD-L2 compared to PD-L1 throughout all meningioma grades
NY-ESO-1 provokes humoral and cellular immune responses.
TAMs represent the largest part of immune infiltrate of meningiomas
They are able to polarize into M1 phenotype (anti-tumor, stimulator of immune system, better prognosis) or M2 (pro-tumor, immunosuppressive effect by stimulating PD-L1 expression, promoting meningioma growth and recurrence)
Decreased M1:M2 ratio in higher meningiomas with higher recurrence rate, and higher M1:M2 ratio associated with improved PFS
|
Garzon-Muvdi et al., 2020 [5] Pinton et al., 2018 [33] Proctor et al., 2019 [8] Domingues et al., 2016 [6] |
MDSCs, a heterogeneous group of immature myeloid cells, with immunosuppressive activity and most represented in grade 2 or 3 meningiomas
Role in promoting vascularization, enhancing PD-L1 and NF2 expression, and tumorigenesis and tumor escaping
Newly discovered role in reducing immune activity by blocking CD8+ T cell and NK activation, M1 polarization, tumor antigen presentation to DCs, and inducing M2 switch
|
Polyzoidis et al., 2015 [9] Reszec et al., 2012 [40] Domingues et al., 2012 [32] Theoharides et al., 2012 [41] Tirakotai et al., 2006 [42] Schober et al., 1988 [43] |
MCs important role in cancer promoting
Role in producing metalloproteinases and secreting CRH, NT, substance P, tryptase, VEGF, TNF, prostaglandins, leukotrienes, and thus contributing to tumor diffusion and to disruption the integrity of the BBB and stimulating PTBE formation
MCs association to recurrence rate and bad prognosis of meningiomas is still debated, and microenvironment of both low and high grade meningiomas contains MCs
|
Zador et al., 2020 [17] Garzon-Muvdi et al., 2020 [5] Li et al., 2019 [44] Domingues et al., 2016 [6] |
Treg are inhinitory T cells
Their percentage is higher in higher grade meningiomas supporting their immunosuppressive potentiality
Their negative impact on survival has been demonstrated in different tumor types
Their effective role in meningiomas is still debated, and Treg infiltration has not been yet demonstrated as independent prognostic factor
|
|
PTBE
|
Berhouma et al., 2019 [45] |
|
Gilbert et al., 1983 [46] |
|
Regelsberger et al., 2009 [47] |
|
Bitzer et al., 1997 [48] |
|
Tanaka et al., 2006 [49] |
|
Nassehi et al., 2013 [50] Reszec et al., 2013 [51] |
|
Kilic et al., 2002 [52] Gawlitza et al., 2017 [53] Polyzoidis et al., 2015 [9] |
|