Table 1.
Study | Population | Groups | Interventions | Exercise Intervention Protocols | Outcomes | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Session Duration (min) | IT Work/Rest Ratio | Frequency | Total Training Time (min) | |||||
Healthy participants | ||||||||
Ballesta-Garcia, 2019 [11] | Healthy adults | WB-HIIT vs. WB-MIIT vs. CTL |
|
WB-HIIT: 18–40 WB-MIIT: 18–50 |
WB-HIIT: 60–90″/120–150″ | WB-HIIT: 16 wks, 2×/wk WB-MIIT: 16 wks, 2×/wk |
WB-HIIT: 928 WB-MIIT: 1088 |
MSF |
Ballesta-Garcia, 2020 [12] | Healthy adults | WB-HIIT vs. WB-MIIT vs. CTL |
|
WB-HIIT: 18–40 WB-MIIT: 18–50 |
WB-HIIT: 60–90″/120–150″ | WB-HIIT: 16 wks, 2×/wk WB-MIIT: 16 wks, 2×/wk |
WB-HIIT: 928 WB-MIIT: 1088 |
CRF |
Blackwell et al., 2017 [20] | Healthy adults | WB-HIIT vs. HIIT |
|
WB-HIIT: 11 HIIT: 11 |
WB-HIIT: 60″/90″ HIIT: 60″/90″ |
WB-HIIT: 4 wks, 3×/wk HIIT: 4 wks, 3×/w |
WB-HIIT: 132 HIIT: 132 |
CRF, Metabolic risk factors |
* Connolly et al., 2020 [18] | Healthy adults | WB-HIIT vs. CTL |
|
WB-HIIT: 15 | WB-HIIT: 30″ low/20″ moderate/10″ high intensity | WB-HIIT: 12 wks, 3×/wk | WB-HIIT: 540 | Metabolic risk factors |
Engel et al., 2019 [22] | Healthy adults | WB-HIIT vs. CTL |
|
WB-HIIT: 30 | WB-HIIT: 20″/10″ | WB-HIIT: 8 wks, 2×/wk | WB-HIIT: 480 | MSF, Metabolic risk factors |
Evangelista et al., 2019 [23] | Healthy adults | WB-HIIT vs. VICT |
|
WB-HIIT: 20 VICT: 20 |
WB-HIIT: 30″/30″ | WB-HIIT: 6 wks, 3×/wk VICT: 6 wks, 3×/wk |
WB-HIIT: 360 VICT: 360 |
Fat mass, Fat-free mass, MSF |
Evangelista et al., 2021 [24] | Healthy adults | WB-HIIT vs. CTL |
|
WB-HIIT: 21 | WB-HIIT: 40″/20″ | Wb-HIIT: 6 wks, 3×/wk | WB-HIIT: 378 | CRF, MSF |
Islam et al., 2019 [25] | Healthy adults | WB-HIIT vs. VICT vs. CTL |
|
WB-HIIT: 4 VICT: 30 |
WB-HIIT: 20″/10″ | WB-HIIT: 4 wks, 4×/wk VICT: 4 wks, 4×/wk |
WB-HIIT: 60 VICT: 480 |
CRF, MSF |
Jimenez-Garcia et al., 2019 [21] | Healthy adults | WB-HIIT vs. WB-MIIT vs. CTL |
|
WB-HIIT: 25 WB-MIIT: 25 |
WB-HIIT: 4′/3′ WB-MIIT: 4′/3′ |
WB-HIIT: 12 wks, 2×/wk WB-MIIT: 12 wks, 2×/wk |
WB-HIIT: 600 WB-MIIT: 600 |
Fat mass, Fat-free mass, MSF |
Lu et al., 2021 [26] | Healthy adults | WB-HIIT vs. HIIT |
|
WB-HIIT: 4 HIIT: 4 |
WB-HIIT: 20″/10″ HIIT:30″/30″ |
WB-HIIT: 12 wks, 3×/wk HIIT: 12 wks, 3×/wk |
WB-HIIT: 144 HIIT: 144 |
CRF, Fat mass, Fat-free mass, MSF |
* McRae et al., 2012 [16] | Healthy adults | WB-HIIT vs. VICT vs. CTL |
|
WB-HIIT: 4 VICT: 30 |
WB-HIIT: 20″/10″ | WB-HIIT: 4 wks, 4×/wk CT: 4 wks, 4×/wk |
WB-HIIT: 48 CT: 480 |
CRF, MSF |
Menz et al., 2019 [27] | Healthy adults | WB-HIIT vs. HIIT |
|
WB-HIIT: 12–16 HIIT: 12–16 |
WB-HIIT: 20″/10″ HIIT: 20″/10″ |
WB-HIIT: 4 wks, 3–4×/wk HIIT: 4 wks, 3–4×/wk |
WB-HIIT: 191 HIIT: 191 |
CRF, Fat mass, Fat-free mass, MSF |
Micielska et al., 2019 [28] | Healthy adults | WB-HIIT vs. CTL |
|
WB-HIIT: 25 | WB-HIIT: 30″/10″ | WB-HIIT: 5 wks, 3×/wk CTL: 2 sessions |
WB-HIIT: 325 CTL: 50 |
CRF, Fat mass, Fat-free mass |
Murawska-Cialowicz et al., 2020 [29] | Healthy adults | WB-HIIT vs. CTL |
|
WB-HIIT: 40 | WB-HIIT: 20″/10″ | WB-HIIT: 8 wks, 2×/wk | WB-HIIT: 640 | CRF, Fat mass, Fat-free mass |
Schaun et al., 2018 [13] | Healthy adults | WB-HIIT vs. HIIT vs. VICT |
|
WB-HIIT: 8 HIIT: 8 VICT: 30 |
WB-HIIT: 20″/10″ HIIT: 20″/10″ |
WB-HIIT: 16 wks, 3×/wk HIIT: 16 wks, 3×/wk VICT: 16 wks, 3×/wk |
WB-HIIT: 384 HIIT: 384 VICT: 1440 |
CRF, Fat mass |
Schaun et al., 2019 [14] |
Healthy adults | WB-HIIT vs. HIIT vs. VICT |
|
WB-HIIT: 8 HIIT: 8 VICT: 30 |
WB-HIIT: 20″/10″ HIIT: 20″/10″ |
WB-HIIT: 16 wks, 3×/wk HIIT: 16 wks, 3×/wk VICT: 16 wks, 3×/wk |
WB-HIIT: 384 HIIT: 384 VICT: 1440 |
MSF |
Schmidt et al., 2016 [30] | Healthy adults | WB-HIIT vs. CTL |
|
WB-HIIT 7: 1 × 7 WB-HIIT 14: 1 × 7 (wk 1–4), 2 × 7 (wk 5–8) |
WB-HIIT: 30″/10″ | WB-HIIT 7: 8 wks, 3×/wk WB-HIIT 14: 8 wks, 3×/wk |
WB-HIIT 7: 168 WB-HIIT 14: 252 |
CRF, Fat mass, MSF |
Sperlich et al., 2018 [31] | Healthy adults | WB-HIIT LV vs. WB-HIIT HV vs. CTL |
|
WB-HIIT LV: 1 × 6 WB-HIIT HV: 2 × 6 |
WB-HIIT LV: Not specified (6 min circuit) WB-HIIT HV: Not specified (6 min circuit) |
WB-HIIT LV: 4 wks, 7×/wk WB-HIIT HV: 4 wks, 14×/wk |
WB-HIIT LV: 168 WB-HIIT HV: 336 |
CRF, Fat mass, Fat-free mass, MSF |
* Wilke et al., 2019 [17] | Healthy adults | WB-HIIT vs. MICT |
|
WB-HIIT: 30 MICT: 50 |
WB-HIIT: 20″/10″ | WB-HIIT: 6 wks, 3×/wk MICT: 6 wks, 3×/wk |
WB-HIIT: 540 MICT: 900 |
CRF, MSF |
Specific populations | ||||||||
Batrakoulis et al., 2018 [32] | Obese women | WB-HIIT vs. CTL |
|
WB-HIIT: 23–41 | WB-HIIT: 20″/40″ | WB-HIIT: 20 wks, 3×/wk | WB-HIIT: 1761 | CRF, Fat mass, Fat-free mass, MSF |
Jung et al., 2019 [33] | Women with sarcopenia | WB-HIIT vs. CTL |
|
WB-HIIT: 25–55 | WB-HIIT: 10″/5″ | WB-HIIT: 12 wks, 3×/wk | WB-HIIT: 1440 | Fat mass, Fat-free mass |
Scott et al., 2019 [34] | Obese adults | WB-HIIT vs. HIIT vs. MICT |
|
WB-HIIT: 8–16 HIIT: 8–16 MICT: 30–50 |
WB-HIIT: 60″/60″ HIIT: 60″/60″ |
WB-HIIT: 12 wks, 3×/wk HIIT: 12 wks, 3×/wk MICT: 12 wks, 3×/wk |
WB-HIIT: 432 HIIT: 432 MICT: 1440 |
CRF, Fat mass, Fat-free mass, Metabolic risk factors |
CRF, cardiorespiratory fitness; CTL, control; HIIT, high-intensity interval training; HR, heart rate; HRR, heart rate reserve; HV, high volume; LV, low volume; MSF, musculoskeletal fitness; MICT, moderate-intensity continuous training; RPE, rate of perceived exertion; VICT, vigorous-intensity continuous training; VT2, second ventilatory threshold; WB-HIIT, whole-body high-intensity interval training; WB-MIIT, whole-body moderate intensity interval training; Wmax, maximal workload, wk(s), week(s), *, excluded from the meta-analysis.