Table 2.
Study ID | Place of Study | Sample Size Teeth/Patient | Age Range (Years) |
Pathology of Teeth | Type of Teeth | Pulp Vitality Tests | Pulp Sensibility Tests | Authors’ Conclusions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gopikrishna et al., 2007 [7] | India | 80/80 | Not reported | Requiring endodontic therapy for prosthodontic considerations or for irreversible pulpitis | Single-rooted incisors, canines and premolars | PO | CT EPT |
Custom-built pulse oximeter dental probe is an effective, accurate and objective method of determining the vitality of permanent teeth. |
Karayilmaz and Kirzioğlu, 2011 [10] | Turkey | 59/51 | 12–18 | Root canal treated | Maxillary anterior teeth | LDF PO |
EPT | LDF was found to be a more reliable and effective method than PO and EPT for assessing the pulpal status of human teeth. |
Dastmalchi et al., 2012 [11] | Iran | 24/24 | 18–50 | Requiring endodontic treatment for prosthodontic reasons | Single-canal mandibular premolars | PO | CT HT EPT |
PO is a reliable method in determining the actual status of the pulp in endodontics; however, CT, HT and EPT are not suitable methods for pulp testing. |
Janani et al., 2020 [12] | India | 79 | 18–56 | Requiring endodontic therapy | Single-rooted teeth | PO | CT HT EPT |
Customized pulse oximeter sensor holder proves to be accurate, reliable and objective in assessing the actual condition of the tooth. |
Chen and Abbott, 2011 [16] | Australia | 121/20 | 18–74 | Suspected or known to have pulp pathosis; previously received or currently undergoing endodontic treatment; or provisionally diagnosed as having a healthy pulp | Not reported | LDF | CT EPT |
Carbon dioxide (CO2) crystals, EPT and LDF were reliable and the most accurate tests, but CO2 and EPT were less repeatable yet less time consuming than LDF. |
Samuel et al., 2014 [25] | India | 120/30 | 7–18 | Free of any dental pathology | Permanent maxillary central and lateral incisors | PO | CT EPT |
In young children, PO method was found to be as accurate as cold test but large variations were seen in electric pulp test. |
Condit, 2015 [26] | Columbus, US | 85 | 6–16 | Traumatized teeth | Maxillary central and lateral incisors | LDF | CT EPT |
LDF could not distinguish between healthy and necrotic pulp tissue among traumatized teeth. |
Sharma et al., 2015 [27] | India | Not reported | 4–15 | Requiring endodontic therapy | Not reported | PO | EPT | PO is an objective, very sensitive and noninvasive method that can be used as a routine method for assessing the pulp vitality in primary, young permanent and mature permanent teeth. |
Ghouth et al., 2019 [28] | UK | 37 | 8–16 | Root canal treated | Permanent anterior teeth | LDF | CT EPT |
LDF was unable to differentiate between teeth with vital and nonvital pulps in children between the ages of 8 and 16 years, with an acceptable level of confidence. |
Ajitha et al., 2020 [29] | India | 30 | 18–50 | Requiring endodontic therapy indicative of irreversible pulpitis | Single-canal incisors, canine and mandibular premolar teeth | PO | CT HT EPT |
The use of custom-made holder is effective in placement of sensor probe onto the tooth surface. It aided in evaluating the actual pulp status by producing accurate interpretation of results. |