Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 5;19(15):9653. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159653

Table 1.

Methodologic quality of individual studies.

Studies Items 1 Study Score Study Quality 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 /30 %
Zaghini et al. 2021 [45] 2 0 2 2 1.5 2 1.5 2 2 2 2 1.5 1 0 1 22.5 75.0 M
Giordano et al. 2021 [44] 2 0 1.5 1.5 1.5 2 1 2 0 2 2 2 0.5 0 1 19.0 63.3 M
Chen et al. 2006 [19] 2 0 1.5 1 0 2 1.5 2 0 2 2 1 1.5 0 1 17.5 58.3 M
Maunder et al. 2006 [47] 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 1.5 0 0 0.5 1.5 0 2 17.5 58.3 M
Zhu et al. 2020 [46] 2 1 1.5 1 0.5 1 1.5 1 2 0 0 1.5 2 0.5 1.5 17.0 56.7 M
Beneria et al. 2020 [42] 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 0.5 0 2 1 0.5 0.5 15.5 51.7 M
Blake et al. 2020 [43] 2 1 1 1 0.5 1 1.5 2 0.5 0 0 2 1 1 1 15.5 51.7 M
Chen et al. 2021 2 0 1.5 1 1.5 1 1.5 0.5 0.5 0 0 0.5 2 1 2 15.0 50.0 L
Cyr et al. 2021 2 1 2 1 1 1 1.5 1 0 0 0 0.5 2 0.5 1.5 15.0 50.0 L
Smith et al. 2020 2 1 1.5 1 1 1 1.5 0.5 0.5 0 0 0.5 1.5 1 2 15.0 50.0 L
Arnetz et al. 2020 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 0.5 0 0 0.5 1.5 0 2 14.5 48.3 L
Lancee et al. 2008 2 0 1 1 1 1 2 2 1.5 0 0 0.5 1 0 1.5 14.5 48.3 L
Xu et al. 2021 2 0 1 0.5 0.5 2 1.5 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 1.5 14.0 46.7 L
Tam et al. 2004 2 1 1.5 1 0.5 1 1.5 2 0 0 0 0.5 1 0 2 14.0 46.7 L
Lasalvia et al. 2021 2 1 2 1 1 1 1.5 1.5 0 0 0 0.5 1 0 1 13.5 45.0 L
Castro-Sanchez et al. 2020 2 1 1 1 0.5 1 0 2 0 0 0 2 1 0.5 1.5 13.5 45.0 L
Zhan et al. 2020 2 1 1.5 1 1 1 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 1.5 1.5 1.5 13.5 45.0 L
Hennein et al. 2021 2 0 2 1 1 1 1.5 1 0 0 0 0.5 2 0 1 13.0 43.3 L
Sharma et al. 2021 2 1 1.5 1 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0.5 1 0 1 13.0 43.3 L
Huang et al. 2020 2 1 1 1 1 1 1.5 1 0 0 0 0.5 2 0 1 13.0 43.3 L
Chan and Huak 2004 2 0 0.5 0.5 1 1 1.5 1.5 1 0 0 0 1 1 2 13.0 43.3 L
Matsuishi et al. 2012 2 0 1.5 1 0.5 1 1.5 2 0 0 0 0.5 1 0 2 13.0 43.3 L
Fiksenbaum et al. 2006 2 0 1 1 1 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 2 12.5 41.7 L
Marjanovic et al. 2007 2 0 1 1 1 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 2 12.5 41.7 L
Petrella et al. 2021 2 1 1 0 0 1 1.5 1 0 0 0 1.5 1.5 0 1.5 12.0 40.0 L
Esmaeilzadeh et al. 2021 2 0 1.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 12.0 40.0 L
Holton et al. 2020 2 0 1 1 0.5 1 2 0.5 0.5 0 0 0 1 1 1.5 12.0 40.0 L
Kim and Choi 2016 2 0 1.5 1 0.5 1 1.5 1.5 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 12.0 40.0 L
Kase et al. 2021 2 1 1 1 1 1 1.5 0 0 0 0 0.5 1.5 0 1 11.5 38.3 L
Young et al. 2021 2 1 1 0 0 1 1.5 1 0 0 0 0.5 1.5 0 2 11.5 38.3 L
Morgantini et al. 2020 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 0 0 0 0.5 1 0 1.5 11.5 38.3 L
Demirjian et al. 2020 2 1 1.5 1 0.5 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1.5 11.5 38.3 L
Durmaz Engin et al. 2021 2 0 1 1 1 1 1.5 1 0 0 0 0.5 1 0 1 11.0 36.7 L
Buch et al. 2021 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 2 0.5 0 0 1.5 0 0 0.5 10.5 35.0 L
Shalhub et al. 2020 2 0 1 1 1 1 1.5 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.5 0 1.5 10.0 33.3 L
Martinez-Caballero et al. 2021 2 0 1 0 0 1 1.5 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 9.5 31.7 L
Temsah et al. 2021 2 1 0.5 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.5 1.5 0 2 9.5 31.7 L
Zhang et al. 2020 1.5 0 1.5 1 0 1 1.5 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 9.5 31.7 L
Cai et al. 2020 2 0 0.5 0.5 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0.5 0.5 8.0 26.7 L
Huffman et al. 2020 2 0 0.5 1 0.5 1 0 0.5 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 7.5 25.0 L
Reidy et al. 2020 2 0 0.5 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0.5 7.5 25.0 L

1 The 15 quality assessment items refer to those presented in Table A2. 2 M: medium; L: low. The complete references for low-quality studies are available upon request to the authors.