Table 3.
Checklist from Joanna Briggs Institute’s criterium according to kind of study, percentage of criterium reached, and quality level of evidence.
| Criteriums According to Kind of Study | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | Percentage Reached | Quality Level |
| Pugh et al. [5] | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 66.7 | MQ | ||||
| Liang et al. [9] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 75.0 | HQ | |||||
| Petersen et al. [7] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 75.0 | HQ | |||||
| Bressa et al. [27] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 100.0 | HQ | |||||
| Karhu et al. [16] | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 55.6 | MQ | ||||
| Keohane et al. [13] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 87.5 | HQ | |||||
| Bycura et al. [31] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 88.9 | HQ | ||||
| Morishima et al. [18] | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 50.0 | MQ | |||||
| Tota et al. [19] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 50.0 | MQ | |||||
| Zhao et al. [22] | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 55.6 | MQ | ||||
| Moitinho-Silva et al. [34] | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 69.2 | MQ |
| Sadowska-Krepa et al. [29] | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 55.6 | MQ | ||||
| Kulecka et al. [33] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 88.9 | HQ | ||||
| Tabone et al. [30] | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 66.7 | MQ | ||||
| Barton et al. [28] | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 75.0 | HQ | |||||
| Craven et al. [32] | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 55.6 | MQ | ||||
HQ: high quality; MQ: medium quality.