Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 28;14(15):3098. doi: 10.3390/nu14153098

Table 1.

Mediterranean diet adherence measured according to two scores: 15-point score and 9-point literature-based score.

MedDiet Diet × Visit
Interaction
Diet Visit
0-Month 2-Month 4-Month 18-Month Change 0–18 Month Change 4–18 Month
(n = 77) (n = 70) (n = 70) (n = 64) Mean Change p-Value 95% CI Mean Change p-Value 95% CI p-Value p-Value p-Value
15 pt MDAS 6.7 ± 0.2 10.0 ± 0.2 9.6 ± 0.2 7.9 ± 0.3 1.3 ± 0.3 <0.0001 0.6, 2.0 −1.7 ± 0.3 0.000 −2.4, −1.0 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
9 pt MDAS 7.8 ± 0.3 10.9 ± 0.2 10.3 ± 0.2 9.2 ± 0.3 1.3 ± 0.2 <0.0001 0.7, 2.0 −1.1 ± 0.3 0.000 −1.8, −0.5 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
HabDiet
0-Month 2-Month 4-Month 18-Month Change 0–18 Month Change 4–18 Month
(n = 70) (n = 67) (n = 67) (n = 62) Mean Change p-Value 95% CI Mean Change p-Value 95% CI
15 pt MDAS 6.7 ± 0.2 6.9 ± 0.2 6.8 ± 0.2 6.9 ± 0.3 0.2 ± 0.3 1.000 −0.5, 0.9 0.2 ± 0.3 1.000 −0.5, 0.8
9 pt MDAS 8.1 ± 0.3 7.9 ± 0.3 7.9 ± 0.3 8.0 ± 0.3 −0.1 ± 0.2 1.000 −0.8, 0.6 0.2 ± 0.3 1.000 −0.5, 0.8

15-point score (adapted from [28]), 9-point score literature-based score based on [30]. Statistical analysis undertaken by LMEM with a diet × visit interaction comparing MedDiet and HabDiet across 4 time points. Mean values ± SEM. Adherence score based on intakes of food groups calculated from food frequency questionnaire data. MDAS, Mediterranean diet adherence score; MedDiet, Mediterranean diet; HabDiet, habitual diet.