Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 7;14(15):3234. doi: 10.3390/nu14153234

Table 4.

Pairwise comparisons between groups on primary and secondary outcomes.

Control vs. Telephone Mobile App vs. Telephone Mobile App vs. Control
QALY—coef (95% CI), p-value 0.04 (0.43, 2.3), p = 0.998 −0.02 (−0.13, 0.08), p = 0.712 −0.08 (−0.18, 0.02), p = 0.135
Survival—HR (95% CI), p-value * 0.999 (−0.45, 2.39), p = 0.923 0.61 (0.27, 1.74), p = 0.434 0.52 (0.23, 1.50), p = 0.265
EORTC QLQ-C30 score #,
  Global health −4.02 (−10.4, 2.4), p = 0.22 −6.00 (−12.70, 0.75), p = 0.082 −0.67 (−7.62, 6.28), p = 0.850
  Physical functioning −2.75 (−9.63, 4.12), p = 0.433 −3.20 (−10.03, 3.63), p = 0.359 −2.31 (−8.29, 3.67), p = 0.448
  Role functioning −6.11 (−16.78, 4.56), p = 0.262 −6.31 (−16.16, 3.54), p = 0.210 −0.12 (−9.95, 9.71), p = 0.980
  Emotional functioning −0.88 (−8.08, 6.33), p = 0.812 −7.07 (−14.37, 0.22), p = 0.057 4.95 (−1.88, 11.78), p = 0.155
  Cognitive functioning −7.36 (−14.15, −0.57), p = 0.034 −1.60 (−8.57, 5.37), p = 0.652 −6.43 (−13.90, 1.04), p = 0.092
  Social functioning −5.38 (−16.73, 6.00), p = 0.353 −3.01, (−12.30, 6.28), p = 0.525 −4.93 (−16.54, 6.68), p = 0.405
  Fatigue 3.08 (−5.77, 11.93), p = 0.496 3.28 (−5.63, 12.19), p = 0.471 1.47 (−7.63, 10.58), p = 0.751
  Nausea and vomiting 0.02 (−5.68, 5.72), p = 0.994 −1.94 (−6.91, 3.04), p = 0.445 3.17 (−2.16, 8.50), p = 0.244
  Pain 1.22 (−9.04, 11.47), p = 0.816 −5.87 (−15.60, 3.85), p = 0.237 11.63 (1.20, 22.06), p = 0.029
  Dyspnoea −0.76 (−9.66, 8.13), p = 0.867 1.26 (−7.14, 9.65), p = 0.769 1.67 (−6.67, 10.02), p = 0.694
  Insomnia −1.94 (−14.94, 11.06), p = 770 5.21 (−8.13, 18.56), p = 0.444 −2.06 (−15.12, 11.00), p = 0.757
  Appetite loss 0.65 (−9.71, 11.00), p = 0.902 3.49 (−6.74, 13.72), p = 0.504 −2.01 (−12.71, 8.70), p = 0.713
  Constipation −2.44 (−12.35, 7.35), p = 0.625 2.75 (−7.11, 12.62), p = 0.584 −0.35 (−12.25, 11.56), p = 0.955
  Diarrhoea 4.84 (−7.16, 16.83), p = 0.429 −0.61 (−12.53, 11.31), p = 0.920 3.94 (−8.47, 16.35), p = 0.534
  Financial difficulties 6.00 (−4.96, 16.97), p = 0.283 8.54 (−1.37, 18.46), p = 0.091 −4.0 (−16.00, 8.00), p = 0.514
PG-SGASF score * −0.87 (−2.69, 0.94), p = 0.346 0.57 (−1.42, 2.55), p = 0.575 −1.20 (−2.98, 0.58), p = 0.186
Weight −2.43 (−5.11, 0.25), p = 0.075 −2.56 (−4.89, −0.23), p = 0.031 0.92 (−1.65, 3.50), p = 0.481

# Multiple imputation was used to replace missing individual data points for conducting comparisons in mean QALY per participant between groups. Adjusted for baseline value of outcome measure, age, gender, baseline PG-SGASF, and cancer location. * Adjusted for age, gender, baseline PG-SGASF score, and cancer location. EORTC QLQ-C30, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire—Core 30; HR, hazard ratio; PG-SGASF, Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment Short Form; QALY, quality-adjusted life years.