Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 5;22(15):5860. doi: 10.3390/s22155860

Table 5.

Accuracy results of classification for 10 simulations, with changing random seeds uniformly in C4D2a_2C.

# of Simulations Subject (Failed/Trials) Success Rate
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 18/288 6/288 19/288 9/288 7/288 6/288 2/288 13/288 7/288 0.966435
2 7/288 9/288 3/288 5/288 4/288 8/288 6/288 6/288 12/288 0.976852
3 2/288 2/288 10/288 1/288 6/288 5/288 0/288 4/288 9/288 0.984954
4 19/288 8/288 10/288 7/288 1/288 9/288 7/288 8/288 6/288 0.971065
5 11/288 5/288 10/288 13/288 10/288 12/288 5/288 10/288 4/288 0.969136
6 6/288 4/288 7/288 5/288 3/288 2/288 2/288 8/288 7/288 0.983025
7 3/288 5/288 3/288 1/288 3/288 7/288 4/288 6/288 2/288 0.986883
8 3/288 4/288 5/288 0/288 3/288 4/288 7/288 5/288 6/288 0.985725
9 1/288 8/288 9/288 3/288 3/288 4/288 0/288 9/288 4/288 0.984182
10 12/288 7/288 9/288 4/288 4/288 5/288 2/288 7/288 6/288 0.978395