Table 2.

Comparison of accuracy results for nuclear pleomorphism.

Method	G1 vs. G2	G1 vs. G3	G2 vs. G3	G1 vs. G2 vs. G3	Approach
Petushi et al. [13]	-	92%	-	72%	Texture features
Basavanhally et al. [10]	72%	93%	74%	-	Texture features
Doyle et al. [8]	-	93%	-	-	Texture and graph features
Naik et al. [7]	-	80.5%	-	-	Template matching and morphological features
Cao et al. [12]	74%	90%	76%	-	DL
Wan et al. [11]	77%	92%	76%	69%	DL
Yan et al. [35]	94.1%	97.8%	93.9%	93.4%	DL
Proposed	-	-	-	84%	Morphological and geometrical features