Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 12;101(32):e29970. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029970

Table 4.

Evaluation of AOSD classifications criteria.

Classification criteria AOSD, n = 80 Controls, n = 60 Sensitivity % Specificity % PPV % NPP % Accuracy %
Yamaguchi 63 0 78.8 [67.9–86.8] 100 [92.5–100] 100 [92.8–100] 77.9 [66.7–86.3] 87.8
Yamaguchi and NLR ≥ 4 72 0 90 [80.7–95.3] 100 [92.5–100] 100 [93.7–100] 88.2 [77.6–94.4] 94.3
Fautrel 61 2 76.3 [65.2–84.8] 96.7 [87.5–99.4] 96.8 [88–99.4] 75.3 [64–84.1] 85
Fautrel and NLR ≥ 4 74 2 92.5 96.7 97.3 90.6 94.3
[83.8–96.9] [87.5–99.4] [90–99.5] [80.1–96.1]