Table 2.
Analysis of covariance estimates of the effect of condition type on employee-perceived soft skills post-intervention
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Condition type (Reference = online intervention) | |||
| Matched control | −0.404*** (0.075) | −0.424*** (0.081) | 0.167 (0.132) |
| Pooled control | −0.204** (0.067) | −0.283** (0.098) | 0.192 (0.143) |
| Perceived soft skills (baseline score) | 0.740*** (0.048) | 0.724*** (0.048) | |
| Condition type × post-intervention score | |||
| Online intervention | 0.323*** (0.064) | ||
| Matched control | −0.132* (0.054) | ||
| Pooled control | 0.040 (0.035) | ||
| Age | 0.008* (0.004) | 0.012 (0.006) | |
| Tenure | −0.009 (0.005) | −0.018 (0.010) | |
| Compensation grade | −0.005 (0.015) | −0.004 (0.025) | |
| Constant | 1.243*** (0.184) | 1.111*** (0.191) | 3.240*** (0.183) |
| Observations | 296 | 296 | 296 |
| R2 value | 0.642 | 0.655 | 0.096 |
Robust SEs are in parentheses. Observations were clustered at the employee level. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.