Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 2;119(32):e2201039119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2201039119

Table 1.

Results of the two-way ANOVA for five example number neurons shown in Fig. 2 CG

Preferred numerosity ANOVA (Firing rate ≈ stimulus type * numerosity)
Numerosity Stimulus type Interaction
num1 F(4,251) = 5.7273, P < 0.001 F(2,251) = 0.9275, P = 0.396 F(8,251) = 1.2411, P = 0.273
num2 F(4,253) = 3.5881, P = 0.007 F(2,253) = 0.2355, P = 0.79 F(8,253) = 0.454, P = 0.887
num3 F(4,496) = 5.8789, P < 0.001 F(2,496) = 0.1179, P = 0.889 F(8,496) = 1.4538, P = 0.173
num4 F(4,308) = 4.2385, P = 0.002 F(2,308) = 0.1141, P = 0.892 F(8,308) = 0.9124, P = 0.506
num5 F(4,355) = 13.4938, P < 0.001 F(2,355) = 1.832, P = 0.162 F(8,355) = 0.3219, P = 0.958

Preferred numerosity: numerosity eliciting the strongest response. ANOVA results (F statistics and P value) for the factor “stimulus type” (“radius-fixed,” “area-fixed,” or “perimeter-fixed”), “numerosity” (numerosity one to five), or interaction between them.