Table 1.
Baseline socio-demographics of qualitative sample by study arm and viral suppression status at study exit (N = 110)a
| SCM Arm (n = 56) |
SOC Arm (n = 54)a |
Total (n = 110)a |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
VS (n = 27) |
Not VS (n = 29) |
VS (n = 32) |
Not VS (n = 22) |
VS (n = 59) |
Not VS (n = 51) |
|
| Age (median, range) |
40 (19–60) |
38 (19–62) |
45 (20–60) |
40.5 (20–61) |
44 (19–60) |
40 (19–62) |
|
Race b Black or African American (n = 97) White (n = 11) |
||||||
| 24 | 26 | 27 | 20 | 51 | 46 | |
| 3 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 8 | 3 | |
| Hispanic origin (n = 5) | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
|
Education High school diploma or less (n = 39) Vocational/trade/technical (n = 8) Some college, including AA (n = 49) BA/BS or higher (n = 14) |
||||||
| 11 | 9 | 10 | 9 | 21 | 18 | |
| 1 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 3 | |
| 13 | 14 | 13 | 9 | 26 | 23 | |
| 1 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 8 | |
|
Employment Not employed (n = 75) Part-time (n = 17) Full-time (18) |
||||||
| 17 | 19 | 22 | 17 | 39 | 36 | |
| 6 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 8 | |
| 4 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 11 | 7 | |
|
Partner status Single/Divorced/Widowed (n = 92) Having primary/main partner, not living together (n = 2) Living w/main partner (n = 14) Married/Civil union/Legal partner (n = 2) |
||||||
| 22 | 26 | 25 | 19 | 47 | 45 | |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 10 | 4 | |
| 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
|
Living situation c Does not have a stable home (n = 10) Lives w/relatives (n = 30) Lives w/roommate(s) (n = 21) Lives w/partner/spouse (n = 16) Lives by self (n = 31) |
||||||
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 6 | |
| 7 | 7 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 14 | |
| 4 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 12 | |
| 4 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 11 | 5 | |
| 10 | 9 | 9 | 3 | 19 | 12 | |
|
Sites Birmingham, Alabama (n = 25a) Atlanta, Georgia (n = 35) Baltimore, Maryland (n = 33) Boston, Massachusetts (n = 17) |
||||||
| 6 | 6 | 9 | 4 | 15 | 10 | |
| 6 | 13 | 8 | 8 | 14 | 21 | |
| 11 | 6 | 9 | 7 | 20 | 13 | |
| 4 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 10 | 7 | |
a The Birmingham site also interviewed one participant who had an unknown VS status at the 12-month follow-up visit. Therefore, the total interviewed participants at the Birmingham site was n = 26. This participant with unknown VS status was not included in analysis of the total 111 interviewed, because VS status was missing; therefore, the total number in this table is 110
bTwo (2) participants identified as bi-racial, thus Race categories sum to more than (N = 110)
c Other=2 (one in SCM arm and one in SOC arm)