Table 3.

Clinical comparison between the two groups for Categorical Indexes (Lachmann test, Pivot Shift Test, Objective IKDC)

Allograft N = 29		Hamstrings N = 32	Group comparison	Time comparison Adjusted p-value
n (%)		n (%)	p value	Allograft				Hamstrings
Lachmann test
T0
1	3 (10.3)	2 (6.2)	0.804		T0	T1	T2	T0	T1	T2
2	14 (48.3)	15 (46.9)		T1	< 0.001*	-		< 0.001*	–
3	12 (41.4)	15 (46.9)		T2	< 0.001*	NA	–	< 0.001*	NA	–
T1				T3	< 0.001*	NA	NA	< 0.001*	NA	NA
0	29 (100.0)	32 (100.0)	NA
T2
0	29 (100.0)	32 (100.0)	NA
T3
0	29 (100.0)	32 (100.0)	NA
Pivot shift test
T0
1	3 (10.3)	7 (21.9)	0.440		T0	T1	T2	T0	T1	T2
2	18 (62.1)	16 (50.0)		T1	< 0.001*	-		< 0.001*	-
3	8 (27.6)	9 (28.1)		T2	< 0.001*	> 0.999	–	< 0.001*	> 0.999	–
T1				T3	< 0.001*	> 0.999	> 0.999	< 0.001*	> 0.999	> 0.999
0	26 (89.7)	25 (78.1)	0.307
1	3 (10.3)	7 (21.9)
T2
0	26 (89.7)	24 (77.4)	0.355
1	3 (10.3)	7 (22.6)
T3
0	26 (92.9)	26 (83.9)	0.428
1	2 (7.1)	5 (16.1)
Objective IKDC
T0
B	1 (3.4)	1 (3.1)	> 0.999		T0	T1	T2	T0	T1	T2
C	13 (44.8)	14 (43.8)		T1	< 0.001*	-		< 0.001*	–
D	15 (51.7)	17 (53.1)		T2	< 0.001*	> 0.999	–	< 0.001*	> 0.999	–
T1				T3	< 0.001*	0.432	> 0.999	< 0.001*	> 0.999	> 0.999
A	22 (75.9)	24 (75.0)	> 0.999
B	7 (24.1)	8 (25.0)
T2
A	24 (82.8)	23 (74.2)	0.623
B	5 (17.2)	8 (25.8)
T3
A	25 (89.3)	25 (80.6)	0.477
B	3 (10.7)	6 (19.4)

^* Statistical significant value (p < 0.05)

IKDC = The International Knee Documentation Committee