Table 1.
F1 Indirect % | F1 Indirect P | F2 Indirect % | F2 Indirect P | F3 Indirect % | F3 Indirect P | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No covariates | ||||||
Executive function | 0.007 | 0.463 | 0.051* | 0.001* | 0.003 | 0.486 |
Neuroticism | 0.005 | 0.842 | 0.003 | 0.836 | 0.013 | 0.777 |
Risk-taking | −0.090* | 0.001* | 0.152* | 1.47E−08* | 0.043* | 0.013* |
Controlling for genetics of substance use | ||||||
Executive function | 0.013 | 0.233 | 0.048* | 0.047* | −0.007 | 0.491 |
Neuroticism | 0.011 | 0.687 | −0.022 | 0.693 | −0.040 | 0.689 |
Risk-taking | 0.001 | 0.509 | 0.019 | 0.446 | −0.002 | 0.741 |
Indirect associations from a mediation model (see Supplementary Fig. 8) where stage-based constructs link non-substance psychopathology (three factors from Lee et al.,) and The Addiction-Risk-Factor. F1 = compulsive disorders, F2 = Psychotic disorders, F3 = Neurodevelopmental disorders. The proportion accounted for by the indirect association (%) and the significance of the indirect association are shown. *P <0 .05 for the indirect association pathway.