Skip to main content
. 2022 May 6;30(8):2800–2816. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2022.05.003

Figure 2.

Figure 2

ABL501 weakens Treg-mediated suppression through promoting effector T cell responses

(A–F) FACS sorted and ex vivo expanded CD25+CD127CD4+ Treg cells were co-cultured with conventional CD4+ or CD8+ T cells isolated from the same human donor in the presence of A375 melanoma cells expressing membrane-bound anti-CD3 scFv (A375-OKT3). (A) Schematic illustration of the ex vivo human Treg cell suppression assay is shown. (B) FACS analysis of Foxp3 expression in ex vivo expanded Treg cells is shown. (C and D) FACS analysis showing CTV dilution (C) or ELISA of IL-2 secretion (D) by CD4+ T or CD8+ T cells in the presence or absence of Treg cells (effector T: Treg = 4:1) is shown. (E and F) FACS analysis shows CTV dilution (E) or ELISA of IL-2 secretion (F) by CD4+ T or CD8+ T cells with the indicated antibodies at a final concentration of 66.8 nM in the presence of Treg cells. (G) Isolated and ex vivo expanded Treg cells were co-cultured with A375-OKT3 cells in the presence of the indicated antibodies at a final concentration of 66.8 nM. Proliferation index of Treg cells was calculated by FlowJo software based on CTV dilution. (H) Isolated conventional CD4+ or CD8+ T cells were co-cultured with A375-OKT3 cells in the presence of the indicated antibodies at a final concentration of 66.8 nM. ELISA of IL-2 secretion by CD4+ T or CD8+ T cells is shown. Data were pooled from three to five independent experiments with two replications. Statistical significance was determined by unpaired t tests with two-tailed analysis in (D) or one-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak multiple comparisons in (E)–(H). ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001, and ns.