Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 29;13:940467. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.940467

Table 1.

Assessment of risk of bias in the included studies.

References Criteria Total
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Askin et al. (36) Y 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 7
Barros et al. (59) Y 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10
Bonin et al. (60) Y 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10
Cha et al. (37) Y 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 9
Chang et al. (38) Y 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 8
Chen et al. (32) Y 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 9
Chen et al. (39) Y 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 8
Chen et al. (41) Y 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 8
Chervyakov et al. (33) Y 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 8
Di Lazzaro et al. (63) Y 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 8
Di Lazzaro et al. (40) Y 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 8
Du et al. (20) Y 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 8
Du et al. (21) Y 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 7
Du et al. (22) Y 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10
Fregni et al. (42) Y 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 8
Guan et al. (51) Y 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10
Harvey et al. (61) Y 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9
Hosomi et al. (53) Y 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9
Hsu et al. (52) Y 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 8
Jil et al. (43) N 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 8
Juan et al. (23) Y 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 9
Khan et al. (50) Y 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 8
Khedr et al. (24) Y 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 8
Kim et al. (25) Y 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 8
Kuzu et al. (26) Y 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 8
Li et al. (27) Y 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 7
Long et al. (28) Y 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 8
Luk et al. (44) Y 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10
Malcolm et al. (45) Y 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 8
Matsuura et al. (46) Y 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 8
Meng et al. (29) Y 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 8
Haghighi et al. (47) Y 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 8
Qin et al. (56) Y 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 7
Rose et al. (62) Y 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9
Sharma et al. (58) Y 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10
Sung et al. (34) Y 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 9
Wang et al. (35) Y 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 9
Yang et al. (54) Y 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 7
Seniów et al. (57) Y 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 9
Gottlieb et al. (55) Y 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10
Higgins et al. (48) Y 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 8
kim et al. (30) Y 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 7
Watanabe et al. (31) Y 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 8
Özkeskin et al. (64) Y 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 9
Kim et al. (49) Y 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 9

Criteria numbers: 1, eligibility criteria; 2, random allocation; 3, concealed allocation; 4, similar groups at baseline; 5, blinding subjects; 6, blinding therapists; 7, blinding assessors; 8, outcome obtained in more than 85% of the subjects; 9, intention-to-treat analysis; 10, between-group statistical comparisons; 11, point estimates and measures of variability.