Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 29;13:944412. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.944412

TABLE 2.

SWOT factors of the Gökçeada in terms of sustainable rural tourism.

SWOT groups SWOT factors
Strengths (W) S1 The effectiveness of traditional architecture
S2 Natural beauty (Desire to be within natural life.)
S3 The fact that the social and cultural identity of Gökçeada has not yet deteriorated
S4 The friendliness and hospitality of the island people
S5 The continuation of intercultural interaction on the island
S6 Popular destination
S7 Applicability of rural tourism for 12 months
S8 Fertile soils that offer a variety of products
Weaknesses (W) W1 Lack of knowledge and entrepreneurship of the locals
W2 Lack of promotion and marketing activities in the region
W3 Insufficient number of accommodation facilities
W4 Inefficient use of existing agricultural potential
W5 The fact that the carrying capacity for tourism on the island has not been determined
W6 Lack of coordination and communication among stakeholders. (local people, non-governmental organizations, local government and public)
W7 Lack of qualified workforce
Opportunities (O) O1 Increasing the interest of local tourists to the region
O2 High agricultural productivity
O3 Having renewable energy sources
O4 Potential to host festivals, summer schools, workshops and various events
O5 Poor transport links that preserve the island fabric
O6 Creating accommodation opportunities suitable for the natural and cultural texture of the region
Treats (T) T1 Natural hazards such as earthquakes, floods, landslides
T2 The tourism concept being more identified with the coastal tourism in Turkey
T3 Losing the original cultural and social values of the villages
T4 Political and economic instability on the island
T5 The disappearance of unprotected examples of civil architecture on the island
T6 Young population leaving the island
T7 Insufficient investment for the island