TABLE 6.
AMUroute– and disease–specific1 |
Estimate | IRR (95% CI) | p-value | Random intercepts | Variances2 (std. dev) | |
Route | Disease | |||||
Feed | Late septicemia | 0.336 | 1.398 (1.109–1.763) | 0.004 | Sampling network | (0.000) |
Feed | Enteric diseases | 0.400 | 1.492 (1.244–1.788) | <0.000 | Year: Sampling network | 0.033 (0.181) |
Water | Enteric diseases | 0.538 | 1.712 (1.300–2.254) | <0.000 | Flock: Year: Sampling network | 0.129 (0.360) |
Intercept | −4.396 | 0.012 (0.010–0.015) | <0.000 |
1AMUroute–disease–specific – Antimicrobial use in the model above is a binomial indicator of whether the flock used the antimicrobial via a given route for a specific disease syndrome. IRR, incidence rate ratio; CI, confidence interval.
2Four levels: isolates at the lowest, flocks at the second, years at the third, and veterinarians at the highest level. Level 1 variance was assumed to be 3.29 (Snijders and Bosker, 2011).