Believed that Bay Area regulations to prevent transmission of COVID-19 were “too much” |
2 |
0 |
Believed that Bay Area regulations to prevent transmission of COVID-19 were “just right” |
10 |
6 |
Believed that Bay Area regulations to prevent transmission of COVID-19 were “not enough” |
4 |
4 |
Believed that they had been closely adhering to all public health regulations |
4 |
1 |
Reported always wearing a mask outside their home in August/Sept 2020, even when outside, unless they were sure no one was around |
4 |
4 |
Reported consistently wearing masks around strangers, but not outdoors or when around people they knew well |
5 |
3 |
Reported making calculated exceptions to official rules or recommendations about masking or social distancing |
3 |
0 |
Reported continuing to see friends or family outside their household during early shelter-in-place orders without masking or other mitigation strategies because of discussions implying a shared commitment to protective behavior (i.e., “they’re pretty safe”) |
4 |
1 |
Reported continuing to see friends or family outside their household during early shelter-in-place orders but only with mitigation strategies in place such as masking, outdoor interactions, and/or open windows and social distancing |
1 |
3 |
Reporting making decisions about COVID-19-related behaviors to influence not just personal risk but also risk to others around them |
4 |
4 |
Identified a specific incident of high risk that they would not have done if able to do it over again |
4 |
1 |
Believed others around them were unable or unwilling to do what was needed to keep themselves and others safe during the pandemic |
2 |
1 |
Described a sense of anxiety watching others taking COVID-19-related risks |
1 |
2 |
Reported wishing they had “gotten out more” and/or seen more people during the first 6 months of the pandemic, given the mental health toll of isolation |
1 |
4 |