Table 9.
Patients | Measurement | Results | Reference |
---|---|---|---|
21 HC, 27 patients with gastroparesis and 5 patients with esophagectomy | Fasting pyloric pressure and compliance | Fasting pyloric compliance 25.2±2.4 mm/mmHg in HV, 16.9±2.1 mm/mmHg in gastroparesis (P <0.05) and 10.9±2.9 mm/mmHg in patients with esophagectomy (; P <0.05). Pyloric dilation in 10 gastroparesis patients with low fasting pyloric compliance increased compliance from 7.4±0.4 to 20.1±4.9 mm/mmHg (P <0.01) and improved the GIQLI score. | Gourcerol 2015, ref. 155 |
54 patients (39 IG, 15 DG) | Fasting pyloric diameter, CSA, pressure, length, DI | Wide range seen in diameter (5.6–22.1 mm) and distensibility (1–55 mm2/mmHg) of the pylorus. Symptoms of early satiety and postprandial fullness were inversely correlated with pyloric sphincter diameter and CSA. | Malik 2015, ref. 156 |
47 DG patients and 67 IG patients with nausea and vomiting | Sleeve manometry and EndoFLIP performed sequentially during the same endoscopy | Basal pyloric pressure was elevated (>10 mmHg) in 34 patients (42% of patients with delayed emptying); significant decrease in distensibility in patients with gastric retention (>20% at 4 h) compared with patients with normal gastric retention (<10%). | Snape 2016, ref. 157 |
30 IG patients and 14 DG patients | Fasting pyloric diameter, CSA, and DI | Greater gastric retention tended to correlate with decreased CSA and pyloric DI. Greater pyloric compliance at baseline correlated with greater improvement in early satiety and nausea at 8 weeks and greater pyloric DI correlated with improvement in upper abdominal pain. | Saadi 2018, ref. 158 |
37 patients with refractory gastroparesis | Fasting CSA, balloon pressure, and DI | Post-G-POEM CSA and DI were significantly higher in the clinical success group and improvement in gastric emptying. | Vosoughi 2020, ref. 159 |
20 patients with refractory gastroparesis | Fasting pyloric diameter and DI before and after G-POEM | G-POEM increased mean and maximum pyloric diameters and mean and maximum pyloric DI on 50 mL EndoFLIP inflation; therapy enhances pyloric opening but may not impair pyloric closure. The clinical success of G-POEM using EndoFLIP inflated to 50mL had specificity of 100% and sensitivity of 72.2% (area under the curve 0.72) at a distensibility threshold of 9.2 mm2/mmHg. | Watts 2020, ref. 160 |
35 patients with gastroparesis: 11 DG, 6 PSG, 17 IG | Fasting pyloric diameter and distensibility before BOTOX | 19/35 patients with reduced (<10 mm2/mm Hg) pyloric distensibility) had benefits: TSS decreased at 3 months and gastric fullness, bloating and GIQLI score and gastric emptying T1/2 all improved; no such benefit in those with normal distensibility. | Desprez 2019, ref. 161 |
(CSA=cross-sectional area; DI =distensibility index; DG=diabetic gastroparesis; GIQLI=Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index; HC=healthy controls; IG=idiopathic gastroparesis; NA=not available; PSG=post-surgical gastroparesis; TSS=total symptom score