Table 3.
Results of PCA and Oblimin with Kaiser Normalization of the two factors.
|
| ||
|---|---|---|
| --- FACTOR --- | ||
|
| ||
| PEOPLE RELATED | GOVERNANCE AND ORGANISATION | |
|
| ||
| Eigenvalues and cumulative proportion of variance explained by principal components analysis | ||
|
| ||
| Eigenvalue | 8.402 | 1.026 |
|
| ||
| Cum. variance | 46.678 | 52.375 |
|
| ||
| Factor pattern Oblimin with Kaiser Normalization | ||
|
| ||
| Empowering | .805 | .064 |
|
| ||
| Holistic | .790 | .064 |
|
| ||
| Person-centered | .781 | .048 |
|
| ||
| Co-produced | .701 | –,.70 |
|
| ||
| Respectful | .608 | .015 |
|
| ||
| Trustful | .536 | –.124 |
|
| ||
| Collaborative | .528 | –.262 |
|
| ||
| Shared responsibility and accountability | .438 | –.241 |
|
| ||
| Reciprocal | .423 | –.415 |
|
| ||
| Flexible | .408 | –.359 |
|
| ||
| Effective | –.179 | –.908 |
|
| ||
| Efficient | –.105 | –.877 |
|
| ||
| Continuous | .142 | –.697 |
|
| ||
| Transparently shared | .190 | –.556 |
|
| ||
| Preventative | .236 | –.552 |
|
| ||
| Led by whole-systems thinking | .237 | –.493 |
|
| ||
| Comprehensive | .331 | –.472 |
|
| ||
| Co-ordinated | .288 | –.465 |
|
| ||