Table 2.
Genomic comparison of Bactrian camels from different research
| Species | Location | Sequencing platform | Sequencing depth (×) | Genome size (Gb) | Contig N50 (kb) | Scaffold N50 (Mb) | Gene number |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wild two-humped camela | Mongolian Wild Camel Protection Area, Mongolia | Illumina Solid 3 Roche | 76 | 2.01 | 90.3 | 2.0 | 20821 |
| Domestic Bactrian camelb | Inner Mongolia, China | Illumina HiSeq 2000 | 79.3 | 1.99 | 139.0 | 8.8 | 20251 |
| Domestic Bactrian camelc | Austrian Zoo Herberstein | Illumina | 6.56 | 1.57 | 2.8 | – | – |
| Wild two-humped cameld | Great Gobi Strictly Protected Area “A”, Mongolia | Pacific Biosciences Sequel | 130 | 2.09 | 5.4 | 76.0 | – |
a See Jirimutu et al. (2012).
b See Wu et al. (2014).
c See Burger and Palmieri (2014).
d See Ming et al. (2020).