Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 12;12:13739. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-18021-1

Table 2.

Comparative performance of B cell epitope prediction methods.

Negative dataset Method/tool % SE % SP % ACC MCC
IRPEP BLAST 50.50 99.20 74.85 0.57
BepiPred 37.60 65.01 51.35 0.03
LBtope 42.21 76.34 59.32 0.20
IBCE-EL 77.80 14.91 46.26 − 0.09
INB BLAST 50.50 88.47 69.48 0.42
BepiPred 37.60 66.60 52.14 0.04
LBtope 42.41 77.73 60.02 0.20
IBCE-EL 77.80 82.11 79.96 0.60

Table reports the sensitivity (% SE), specificity (% SP), accuracy (% ACC) and Matthew’s correlation coefficient (MMC) of the BLAST-based method, BepiPred, LBtope and IBCE-EL discriminating B cell epitopes in the BECIP dataset from non-B cell epitopes in two different datasets (IRPEP and INB). B cell epitope predictions with LBtope and IBCE-EL were carried out at the relevant web sites and BepiPred predictions were carried out using the standalone version of BepiPred (details in “Methods”).