Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 6;61(5):252–256. doi: 10.1111/j.1875-595X.2011.00068.x

Table 3.

Rating of the SDR Filling Technique with regard to various parameters in comparison with the technique used to date by the dentist for posterior fillings (n = 1,319)

Better, % Slightly better, % Slightly worse, % Worse, % n/a, %
Timesaving 34.5 47.9 10.3 1.1 6.2
Simplicity of procedure 37.9 48.2 7.8 0.8 5.3
Overall handling 30.1 53.0 10.1 1.6 5.1
Approximal contact 11.9 39.5 34.3 6.7 7.7
Adaptation 30.3 54.4 8.2 1.0 6.0