Table 1.
Analysis category | Factors shaping political priority |
---|---|
Ideas: The ways in which those involved with the issue understand and portray it |
1. Internal frame: the degree to which the policy community agrees on the definition of causes and solutions to the problem |
2. External frame: public portrayals of the issue in ways that resonate with external audiences, especially the political leaders that control resources | |
Issue characteristics: Features of the problem |
3. Credible indicators: clear measures that show the severity of the problem and that can be used to monitor progress |
4. Severity: the size of the burden relative to other problems, as indicated by objective measurement such as mortality and morbidity levels | |
5. Effective interventions: the extent to which proposed means of addressing the problem are clearly explained, cost-effective, backed by scientific evidence, simple to implement and inexpensive | |
Actor power: Strength of the individuals and organisations concerned with the issue |
6. Guiding institutions: the effectiveness of organisations or coordinating mechanisms with a mandate to lead the initiative |
7. Policy community cohesion: the degree of coalescence among the network of individuals and institutions centrally involved with the issue at the global level | |
8. Leadership: the presence of individuals capable of uniting the policy community and acknowledged as particularly strong leaders for the cause | |
9. Civil society mobilisation: the extent to which grassroots organisations have mobilised to press international and national political authorities to address the issue at the global level | |
Political contexts: The environments in which actors operate |
10. Policy windows: political moments when global conditions align favourably for an issue, presenting opportunities for advocates to influence decision makers |
11. Global governance structure: the degree to which norms and institutions operating in a sector provide a platform for effective action |