Table 4.
Examined concentration of the key variables and results of CCD experiment
| Trial no. | X1Ricinus communis | X2 Moistening agent | X3 Time | Activity (IU/g) | Predicted (IU/g) | Residual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | (−)2 | (−)4 | (−)7 | 140 ± 1.036 | 136.6638 | 3.3362 |
| 2 | (+)4 | (−)8 | (−)7 | 31 ± 0.69 | 37.86154 | −6.86154 |
| 3 | (−)2 | (+)8 | (−)7 | 139 ± 0.36 | 152.2008 | −13.2008 |
| 4 | (+)4 | (+)16 | (−)7 | 10 ± 0.58 | 3.150242 | 6.849758 |
| 5 | (−)2 | (−)4 | (+)15 | 174.05 ± 0.23 | 195.4369 | −21.3863 |
| 6 | (+)4 | (−)8 | (+)15 | 120 ± 0.89 | 118.6143 | 1.3857 |
| 7 | (−)2 | (+)8 | (+)15 | 211 ± 0.95 | 204.9636 | 6.0364 |
| 8 | (+)4 | (+)16 | (+)15 | 65 ± 1.06 | 71.88248 | −6.88248 |
| 9 | (−2) 1 | (0) 3 | (0) 11 | 245 ± 0.25 | 236.2326 | 8.7674 |
| 10 | (+2) 5 | (0) 15 | (0) 11 | 5 ± 0.68 | 6.088892 | −1.08889 |
| 11 | (0) 3 | (−2) 3 | (0) 11 | 128 ± 1.22 | 121.7481 | 6.2519 |
| 12 | (0) 3 | (+2) 15 | (0) 11 | 109 ± 0.88 | 110.0048 | −1.0048 |
| 13 | (0) 3 | (0) 9 | (−2) 3 | 45 ± 1.30 | 43.90515 | 1.09485 |
| 14 | (0) 3 | (0) 9 | (+2) 19 | 181 ± 1.66 | 174.4156 | 6.5844 |
| 15 | (0) 3 | (0) 9 | (0) 11 | 116 ± 0.28 | 113.9783 | 2.0217 |
| 16 | (0) 3 | (0) 9 | (0) 11 | 116 ± 0.28 | 113.9783 | 2.0217 |
| 17 | (0) 3 | (0) 9 | (0) 11 | 116 ± 0.28 | 113.9783 | 2.0217 |
| 18 | (0) 3 | (0) 9 | (0) 11 | 116 ± 0.28 | 113.9783 | 2.0217 |
| 19 | (0) 3 | (0) 9 | (0) 11 | 116 ± 0.28 | 113.9783 | 2.0217 |
| 20 | (0) 3 | (0) 9 | (0) 11 | 116 ± 0.28 | 113.9783 | 2.0217 |
R-square, 0.98622; adjusted R-square, 0.972439. P-value: 2.69E-07