TABLE 1.
Contrast | Mean‐ignition—Mean (SD) | t statistic | Uncorr‐p | FWE‐p | Node‐metastability—Mean (SD) | t statistic | Uncorr‐p | FWE‐p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
cis men vs. cis women |
cis men: 0.9268 (0.0003) cis women: 0.9259 (0.0003) trans men: 0.9259 (0.0002) trans women: 0.9256 (0.0003) |
72.459 | .001 | <.004 |
cis men: 0.0066 (0.0005) cis women: 0.0067 (0.0005) trans men: 0.0063 (0.0003) trans women: 0.0065 (0.0005) |
−3.194 | .002 | <.004 |
cis men vs. trans men | 91.394 | .001 | <.004 | 15.656 | .001 | <.004 | ||
cis men vs. trans women | 95.284 | .001 | <.004 | 6.912 | .001 | <.004 | ||
cis women vs. trans men | 18.936 | .001 | <.004 | 18.850 | .001 | <.004 | ||
cis women vs. trans women | 22.826 | .001 | <.004 | 10.106 | .001 | <.004 | ||
trans men vs. trans women | 3.890 | .001 | <.004 | −8.744 | .001 | <.004 |
Note: Data are means and standard deviations. There were significant differences between all contrast groups with Monte Carlo 1000 permutations and family‐wise error (FWE) correction.