TABLE 2.
Intrinsic ignition by networks of averaged nodes across groups
| Measure | Contrast | t statistic | Uncorr‐p | Corrected‐p | Cohen's d |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dorsal attention network | |||||
| Mean‐ignition | |||||
| cis men vs. cis women | 3.463 | .002 | .002 | 1.1 | |
| cis men vs. trans men (education as covariate) |
2.784 no‐cov: 3.368 |
.005 no‐cov: .001 |
.016 no‐cov: .007 |
.94 | |
| cis men vs. trans women | 2.666 | .008 | .016 | .79 | |
| Node‐metastability | |||||
| cis men vs. cis women | 2.515 | .006 | .015 | .8 | |
| cis men vs. trans men (education as covariate) |
2.476 no‐cov: 2.681 |
.006 no‐cov: .008 |
.025 no‐cov: .023 |
.71 | |
| cis men vs. trans women | 2.407 | .007 | .030 | .86 | |
| Ventral attention network | |||||
| Node‐metastability | |||||
| cis men vs. cis women | 2.269 | .010 | .024 | .74 | |
| cis men vs. trans men (education as covariate) |
2.455 no‐cov: 2.252 |
.010 no‐cov: .022 |
.026 no‐cov: .048 |
.66 | |
| cis men vs. trans women | 2.190 | .016 | .044 | .82 | |
| Control executive network | |||||
| Mean‐ignition | |||||
| cis men vs. cis women | 2.379 | .008 | .021 | .71 | |
| Node‐metastability | |||||
| cis men vs. cis women | 2.100 | .015 | .037 | .61 | |
| cis men vs. trans men (education as covariate) |
2.875 no‐cov: 2.895 |
.004 no‐cov: .008 |
.012 no‐cov: .018 |
.8 | |
| cis men vs. trans women | 2.092 | .019 | .055 | .68 | |
| Default mode network | |||||
| Mean‐ignition | |||||
| cis men vs. cis women | −2.246 | .019 | .042 | −.67 | |
| cis women vs. trans men (age & education as covs) |
2.050 no‐covs: 2.863 |
.020 no‐covs: .003 |
.055 no‐covs: .009 |
.91 | |
| somatomotor network | |||||
| Node‐metastability | |||||
| cis men vs. cis women | 2.442 | .007 | .019 | .72 | |
| limbic network | |||||
| Mean‐ignition | |||||
| cis men vs. trans men (education as covariate) |
2.869 no‐cov: 2.551 |
.003 no‐cov: .014 |
.012 no‐cov: .032 |
.75 | |
| Node‐metastability | |||||
| cis men vs. trans men (education as covariate) |
2.257 no‐cov: 1.75 |
.016 no‐cov: .05 |
.039 no‐cov: .105 |
.54 | |
| temporal parietal network | |||||
| Mean‐ignition | |||||
| cis men vs. cis women | 2.625 | .007 | .013 | .74 | |
| cis men vs. trans men (education as covariate) |
3.479 no‐cov: 2.896 |
.001 no‐cov: .007 |
.002 no‐cov: .018 |
.94 | |
| cis men vs. trans women | 2.954 | .002 | .005 | .91 | |
Note: General linear model with 1000 permutations and family‐wise error (FWE) correction were applied. Cohen's d effect sizes were computed. The cis men versus trans men contrast was tested with and without (no‐cov) education as covariate, and the comparison between cis women and trans men with and without (no‐covs) age and years of education as covariates.