Table 2.
Evaluation of the effectiveness of the treatments for arrest of decay
| Group | Success | Failure | Total | P value | RR (95.0% CI) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 months | 12 months | 6 months | 12 months | 6 months | 12 months | 6 months | 12 months | 6 months | 12 months | |||||||
| n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | |||||
| SDF | 155 | 84.7 | 113 | 66.9 | 28 | 15.3 | 56 | 33.1 | 183 | 100.0 | 169 | 100.0 | <0.001* | <0.001* | 1.59 (1.36–1.87) | 1.73 (1.38–2.18) |
| IRT | 86 | 53.1 | 59 | 38.6 | 76 | 46.9 | 94 | 61.4 | 162 | 100.0 | 153 | 100.0 | ||||
| Total group | 241 | 69.9 | 172 | 53.0 | 104 | 30.1 | 150 | 46.6 | 345 | 100.0 | 322 | 100.0 | ||||
CI, confidence interval; IRT, interim restorative treatment; SDF, silver diamine fluoride.
P values obtained by Pearson’s chi-squared test.