Table 3.
Study | DS | Xylitol group | Sorbitol group | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BL | N | n | Mean | SD | LtF | BL | N | n | Mean | SD | LtF | ||
Milgrom et al.20 | 01 | 35 | 33 | Nil | 0.6 | 1.1 | 2 | 32 | 29 | Nil | 1.9 | 2.4 | 3 |
02 | 33 | 32 | Nil | 1 | 1.4 | 1 | 32 | 29 | Nil | 1.9 | 2.4 | 3 | |
Mäkinen et al.21 | 03 | 60 | 37 | Nil | 0.01 | 3.4 | 23 | 65 | 33 | Nil | 0.6 | 5.7 | 32 |
Mäkinen et al.22 | 04 | 125 | 95 | Nil | −0.8 | 0.5 | 30 | 129 | 120 | Nil | 3.8 | 0.4 | 9 |
Mäkinen et al.26 | 07 | Nil | 75 | 10 | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | 157 | 17 | Nil | Nil | Nil |
08 | Nil | 120 | 32 | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | 157 | 17 | Nil | Nil | Nil | |
09 | Nil | 133 | 20 | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | 157 | 17 | Nil | Nil | Nil | |
10 | Nil | 176 | 43 | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | 157 | 17 | Nil | Nil | Nil | |
Mäkinen et al.26 | 11 | Nil | 337 | 94 | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | 571 | 85 | Nil | Nil | Nil |
12 | Nil | 529 | 138 | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | 705 | 108 | Nil | Nil | Nil | |
Mäkinen et al.23 | 05 | Nil | 36 | Nil | 15.5 | 1.08* | Nil | Nil | 60 | Nil | 20.67 | 0.62* | Nil |
06 | Nil | 90 | Nil | 24.2 | 0.48* | Nil | Nil | 63 | Nil | 36.4 | 0.72* | Nil | |
Hujoel et al.27 | 13 | Nil | 2,746 | 32 | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | 4,129 | 87 | Nil | Nil | Nil |
14 | Nil | 5,234 | 72 | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | 4,088 | 83 | Nil | Nil | Nil | |
Machiulskiene et al.24 | 15 | 126 | 107 | Nil | 5.5 | 0.52† | 19 | 118 | 105 | Nil | 3 | 0.45† | 13 |
16 | 126 | 99 | Nil | 8.1 | 0.62† | 27 | 118 | 68 | Nil | 9 | 0.80† | 50 | |
17 | 125 | 99 | Nil | 3.2 | 0.3† | 26 | 114 | 71 | Nil | 3.4 | 0.48† | 43 | |
Mäkinen et al.25 | 18 | 41 | 41 | Nil | 2.6 | 0.55* | 0 | 42 | 42 | Nil | 13.7 | 2.64* | 0 |
SD calculated from 95% confidence interval (asymmetric).
SD calculated from 95% confidence interval (symmetric).
DS, dataset number; BL, number at baseline; N, number evaluated; n, number of events; SD, standard deviation; LtF, lost to follow-up; Nil, no information provided.