Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 7;62(1):21–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1875-595X.2011.00081.x

Table 3.

Chi-squared test

Department Value df Asymptotic significance (two-sided) Exact significance (two-sided) Exact significance (one-sided)
Prosthodontics
Pearson chi-squared 24.350* 1 0.000
Continuity correction 21.478 1 0.000
Likelihood ratio 27.374 1 0.000
Fisher’s exact test 0.000 0.000
Linear by linear association 23.809 1 0.000
Number of valid cases 45
Orthodontics
Pearson chi-squared 1.386 1 0.239
Continuity correction 0.58 1 0.446
Likelihood ratio 1.395 1 0.238
Fisher’s exact test 0.408 0.233
Linear by linear association 1.328 1 0.249
Number of valid cases 24
Endodontics
Pearson chi-squared 21.330§ 1 0.000
Continuity correction 19.36 1 0.000
Likelihood ratio 22.17 1 0.000
Fisher’s exact test 0.000 0.000
Linear by linear association 21.127 1 0.000
Number of valid cases 105
Paedodontics
Pearson chi-squared 0.839 1 0.36
Continuity correction 0.235 1 0.628
Likelihood ratio 0.867 1 0.352
Fisher’s exact test 0.426 0.318
Linear by linear association 0.813 1 0.367
Number of valid cases 32
*

0 cells (0%) have an expected count <5. The minimum expected count is 9.78.

Computed only for a 2 × 2 table.

1 cell (25.0%) has an expected count <5. The minimum expected count is 4.58.

§

0 cells (0%) have an expected count <5. The minimum expected count is 23.80.

0 cells (0%) have an expected count <5. The minimum expected count is 3.06.