Table 4.
Year | Author | N | Histology | PET/CT-MP | HP | Association/ Correlation | Purpose | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019 | Xu et al | 231 | Colorectal cancer | MTV, TLG, SUV | NLR, PLR, PLT, LMR | NLR and LMR with SUV, MTV, TLG | Correlation of pre-treatment HPs with PET/CT-MP and estimate the prognostic value of both. | NLR and LMR correlated with SUVmax, MTV, and TLG. NLR in M1 higher than M0. LMR in M1 lower than M0. OS benefit with low MTV, low NLR and high LMR. |
2019 | Abu-Shawer et al | 264 | Endometrial, ovarian cervical cancer, | Na | ANC, AMC, MCR PLR, NLR | Na | Association of NLR, MLR, PLR, and OS in advanced gynecological cancers | High baseline NLR (≥ 4.1) and high baseline PLR (≥ 0.3) with more distant metastases |
2019 | Can et al | 129 | Invasive ductal carcinoma | MTV, TLG, SUV | MPR, NLR, ER, PR, Her2, Ki67 | NLR with SUV and TLG None for ICH | Relation of MTV of primary mass and ALN to molecular subtype, IHC, and inflammatory markers | ALN was associated with MTV and TLG. NLR correlated with primary mass and ALN PET parameters. PET parameters did not change with respect to molecular subtype or IHC markers. Primary mass and ALN metastasis PET parameters showed significant positive correlations for TLG and SUVmax |
2019 | Mirili et al | 54 | Small cell lung cancer | MTV, TLG, SUV | NLR | NLR with SUV, TLG, MTV | Evaluation of NLR with PET–CT MPs | NLR ≥ 4, MTV ≥ 60, had lower OS and PFS. Correlation between NLR and SUV, TLG, and MTV |
2019 | Du et al | 89 | Cervical cancer | MTV, TLG, SUV | NLR, PLR, HS | NLR and PLR with MTV, TLG, and SCC-ag | Investigation of optimal PET parameters and percentage of SUVmax (%SUVmax) thresholds for tumor recurrence evaluation, and the relationship with hematological parameters in patients with LACC | MTV and TLG had slight-to-moderate correlations with SCC-ag, NLR and PLR |
2018 | McSorley et al | 33 | Preoperative colorectal cancer | MTV, TLG, SUV | NLR, mGPS | None | Relationship between PET-CT MPs and host systemic inflammation | There was no association between 18 F-FDG-PET/CT measures of tumor metabolism and systemic inflammation in the 33 preoperative patients |
2018 | McSorley et al | 70 | Colorectal cancer (reurrence) | MTV, TLG, SUV | NLR, mGPS | NLR and mGPS with SUV, MTV, TLG | Relationship between PET-CT MPs and host systemic inflammation | Patients with NLR ≥ 5 had a higher SUV, MTV, and TLG. Patients with mGPS of 1–2 had a higher SUV, MTV, and TLG |
2015 | Sürücü et al | 53 | Esophageal cancer | MTV, SUV | NLR, PLR, MPN | NLR with MTV. None for SUV | Correlation NLR, PLR, and MPV, with SUVmax, and MTV | NLR was correlated with MTV, SUVmax was not correlated with hematological parameters |
2019 | Wang et al | 122 | Non-small cell lung cancer | MTV, SUV | ICH | SUV with IHC, NLR, PLR | Correlation between PET/CT-MP and intra-tumor immunomarkers' expression | SUV values have significant variations for different EGFR statuses (wild vs mutant type), NLR, and PLR. Correlation between SUV and CD8 tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, CD163 tumor-associated macrophages, and Foxp3-regulatory T cells (Tregs), as well as PD-1 and PD-L1 |
2021 | Present study | 71 | Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma | SUV, MTV, TLG | NLR, PLR | PLR with MTV and TLG | Correlation between NLR and PLR with SUVmax, SUVmean, MTV, and TLG | PLR correlates with MTV and TLG. SUVmax and SUVmean do not correlate with hematological parameters |
Patient number (N), positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), metabolic parameter (MP), hematological parameter (HP), standardized uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), tumor lesion glycolysis (TLG), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), monocyte-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), immunohistochemistry (ICH), axillary lymph node (ALN), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-ag), modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), mean platelet volume (MPV), not applicable (na)