Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 13;23:206. doi: 10.1186/s12931-022-02129-z

Table 1.

Characteristics of study subjects included in immunohistochemical analysis

Parameters IPF (n = 50) Control (n = 10)
Tissue sample histology, n (%)
Normal 10 (100)
UIP 47 (94)
UIP and DAD 3 (6)
Two separate lung tissue samples—Surgical lung biopsy and autopsy lung tissue specimen, n (%)
UIP in biopsy and UIP with DAD in autopsy 6 (12)
UIP with DAD in both biopsy and autopsy specimens 2 (4)
Age years, mean (SD) 62.3 (7.9) 70.5 (6.4)
Gender, n (%)
Male 37 (74) 1 (10)
Female 13 (26) 9 (90)
Smoking status, n (%)a
Never-smoker 17 (38) 9 (90)
Ex-smoker 20 (44) 1 (10)
Current smoker 8 (18) 0 (0)
Pack-years of ever-smokers, median (IQR)b 25.0 (19.5–37.0) 7
FVC%, mean (SD)c 73.8 (15.5) 100.8 (17.5)
FEV1%, mean (SD)c 78.4 (16.7) 99.3 (19.3)
DLCO%, median (IQR)d 53.0 (45.0–62.1) 87.8 (76.4–111.0)
Follow up time, months, median (IQR)e 41.3 (15.1–73.8)
Episode of AE during follow-up, n (%) 22 (44)
Diseased or transplanted, n (%) 39 (78)
Transplanted, n (%) 4 (8.0)

The values were from the time of surgical lung biopsy (IPF). For follow-up time, death or lung transplantation was used as an endpoint event. Follow-up time for patients having no endpoints was defined as the time between biopsy date and May 11, 2021. Non-smoking patients operated for lung cancer were used as controls

AE acute exacerbation, DAD diffuse alveolar damage, DLCO% percent predicted diffuse capacity for carbon monoxide, FEV1% percent predicted forced expiratory volume at one second, FVC% percent predicted forced vital capacity, IQR interquartile range, n number, SD standard deviation, UIP usual interstitial pneumonia

aIPF n = 45

bIPF n = 25

cIPF n = 42, control n = 9

dIPF n = 41, control n = 8

eIPF n = 49