Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 11;36(1):3–6. doi: 10.4103/sjopt.sjopt_204_21

Table 1.

Population-based epidemiological studies of keratoconus*,**

Author Location Age (years), mean Sample size Prevalence/100,000 Method Sampling method
Hofstetter[17] Indianopolis, USA 1-79 13,345 120 Placido disc* Rural volunteers
Santiago et al. (1995)[11] France 18-22 670 1190 Topography Army recruits
Jonas et al.[18] Maharashtra, India >30 (49.4±13.4) 4667 2300 Keratometry* Rural volunteers (8 villages)
Millodot et al.[16] Jerusalem, Israel 18-54 (24.4±5.7) 981 2340 Topography Urban volunteers (1 college)
Waked et al.[20] Beirut, Lebanon 22-26 92 3300 Topography Urban volunteers (1 college)
Xu et al.[19] Beijing, China 50–93 (64.2±9.8) 3166 900 Optical low coherence reflectometry* Rural+urban volunteers
Hashemi et al.[21] Shahrud, Iran 50.83±0.12 4592 760 Topography Urban volunteers from random cluster
Hashemi et al.[22] Tehran, Iran 14-81 (40.8±17.1) 426 3300 Topography Urban volunteers (stratified cluster)
Shneor et al. (2014)[12] Haifa, Israel 18-60 (25.05±8.83) 314 3180 Topography Urban volunteers (1 college)
Hashemi et al.[23] Mashhad, Iran 20-34 (26.1±2.3) 1073 2500 Topography Urban volunteers (stratified cluster in 1 university)
Torres Netto et al.[24] Riyadh, Saudi Arabia 6-21 (16.8±4.2) 1044 4790 Rotational Scheimpflug corneal tomography system Patients who were seen at emergency rooms for nonophthalmic appointments at four locations in Saudi Arabia

*The methods for detecting keratoconus used in these studies have limitations and results should be interpreted with caution, **[Table 1] was modified from original