Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 1;13:968859. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.968859

Table 2.

Comparison of MoCA among LAN, RAN, and HC groups.

LAN
(n = 40)
RAN (n = 24) HC (n = 67) H values p-value Post-hoc
Visuospatial executive 3.00 (2.00) 2.00 (2.00) 4.00 (2.00) 44.844 <0.001* RAN < HC
LAN < HC
Naming 3.00 (1.00) 2.00 (2.00) 3.00 (1.00) 10.569 0.005* RAN < HC RAN < LAN
Attention 5.00 (1.00) 5.00 (1.00) 6.00 (0.00) 27.776 <0.001* RAN < HC
LAN < HC
Language 1.50 (1.00) 1.00 (2.00) 2.00 (2.00) 18.815 <0.001* RAN < HC
LAN < HC
Language: sentence repetition 1.00 (1.00) 0.00 (1.00) 1.00 (1.00) 15.045 0.001* RAN < HC
LAN < HC
Language: fluency task 1.00 (0.00) 1.00 (1.00) 1.00 (0.00) 14.677 0.001* RAN < HC
LAN < HC
Abstract thinking 1.00 (2.00) 1.00 (2.00) 2.00 (1.00) 9.391 0.009* RAN < HC
Delayed recall 2.00 (2.00) 2.00 (2.00) 3.00 (3.00) 13.884 0.001* RAN < HC
LAN < HC
Orientation 6.00 (1.00) 6.00 (1.00) 6.00 (0.00) 12.543 0.002* RAN < HC
LAN < HC
MoCA scores 21.00 (6.00) 19.00 (9.00) 26.00 (5.00) 37.407 <0.001* RAN < HC
LAN < HC

p- and H values were obtained by Kruskal-Wallis H (non-parametric test). Data were expressed as median (interquartile range).

*

p < 0.05. LAN, left acoustic neuroma; RAN, right acoustic neuroma; HC, healthy controls; MoCA, Montreal cognitive assessment.