TABLE 3.
Comparison of the main characteristics of the two new symbionts (the best drafts) with their closest relatives.
Genome | Louse host | Mammal host | Genome size (bp) | GC content (%) | Coding density (%) | CDS | Predicted proteins | Hypothetical proteins | Pseudogens | Transposases | Phage-related sequences | Mobile elements | BUSCO evaluation (%) |
Lightella neohaematopini (L207) | Neohaematopinus pacificus | Tamias alpinus | 462,938 | 22.2 | 90.5 | 449 | 443 | 23 | 29 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 45.2 |
Puchtella sp. str. PRUG | Pedicinus badii | Procolobus rufomitratus | 558,122 | 24.2 | 92.4 | 602 | 547 | 34 | 47 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 72.7 |
Neisseriaceae-related symbiont (N206) | Neohaematopinus pacificus | Tamias obscurus | 1,476,030 | 33.7 | 75.7 | 1,501 | 1,472 | 515 | 133 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 62.2 |
Neisseriaceae-related symbiont (PsAf) | Polyplax serrata | Apodemus flavicollis | 1,814,374 | 33.7 | 89.4 | 1,739 | 1,660 | 336 | 106 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 85.8 |
Neisseriaceae-related symbiont (HaMa) | Hoplopleura acanthopus | Microtus arvalis | 1,607,498 | 33.4 | 83.5 | 1,369 | 1,303 | 207 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 80.9 |