Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 1;13:900312. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.900312

TABLE 3.

Comparison of the main characteristics of the two new symbionts (the best drafts) with their closest relatives.

Genome Louse host Mammal host Genome size (bp) GC content (%) Coding density (%) CDS Predicted proteins Hypothetical proteins Pseudogens Transposases Phage-related sequences Mobile elements BUSCO evaluation (%)
Lightella neohaematopini (L207) Neohaematopinus pacificus Tamias alpinus 462,938 22.2 90.5 449 443 23 29 0 0 0 45.2
Puchtella sp. str. PRUG Pedicinus badii Procolobus rufomitratus 558,122 24.2 92.4 602 547 34 47 0 0 0 72.7
Neisseriaceae-related symbiont (N206) Neohaematopinus pacificus Tamias obscurus 1,476,030 33.7 75.7 1,501 1,472 515 133 2 2 0 62.2
Neisseriaceae-related symbiont (PsAf) Polyplax serrata Apodemus flavicollis 1,814,374 33.7 89.4 1,739 1,660 336 106 5 0 0 85.8
Neisseriaceae-related symbiont (HaMa) Hoplopleura acanthopus Microtus arvalis 1,607,498 33.4 83.5 1,369 1,303 207 11 11 0 0 80.9