Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 2;65(3):120–126. doi: 10.1111/idj.12153

Table 2.

Binary logistic regression analysis of subjective halitosis based on psychological variables and personality traits

Variable Model 1 OR (95% CI) Model 2 OR (95% CI) Model 3 OR (95% CI)
Demographic factors
Age 0.98 (0.97–0.99) 0.98 (0.97–0.99) 0.98 (0.97–0.99)
Sex (female) 1.12 (0.98–1.29) 1.05 (0.91–1.21) 1.00 (0.86–1.15)
Educational level (graduate) 0.98 (0.85–1.12) 1.06 (0.92–1.22) 1.07 (0.93–1.23)
Marital status (married) 1.67 (1.40–1.97) 1.66 (1.42–2.01) 0.58 (1.38–2.04)
Personality traits
Neuroticism
Tertile 1 Ref
Tertile 2 1.29 (1.09–1.51)
Tertile 3 1.74 (1.43–2.13)
Extraversion
Tertile 1 Ref
Tertile 2 0.92 (0.77–1.09)
Tertile 3 0.98 (0.86–1.27)
Openness
Tertile 1 Ref
Tertile 2 1.04 (0.88–1.22)
Tertile 3 1.01 (0.85–1.21)
Agreeableness
Tertile 1 Ref
Tertile 2 0.92 (0.78–1.08)
Tertile 3 0.75 (0.62–1.09)
Conscientiousness
Tertile 1 Ref
Tertile 2 0.82 (0.70–0.98)
Tertile 3 0.65 (0.53–0.80)
Psychological variable
Presence of depression 1.31 (1.09–1.57)
Presence of anxiety 1.76 (1.38–2.24)
High stress level 1.41 (1.17–1.71)

95% CI, 95% confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.

Model 1: Demographic factors.

Model 2: Personality traits adjusted by demographic factors.

Model 3: Other psychological variables adjusted by demographic factors.