Table 4.
Comparison of classification accuracy (%) against alternative approaches, with v, -, and * suggesting statistically better, same, and worse performance than the proposed work at p < 0.01.
Run | DS-ANFIS | J48 | SVM | RandomForest | SGERD | SLAVE2 | QuickRules |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 82.01 ± 6.92 | 79.12 ± 6.87 | 78.58 ± 7.85 | 80.17 ± 4.88 | 71.63 ± 5.38 | 79.61 ± 4.10 | 76.12 ± 8.45 |
2 | 81.77 ± 6.71 | 78.05 ± 5.29 | 77.48 ± 4.08 | 80.45 ± 3.91 | 75.85 ± 6.22 | 78.80 ± 6.40 | 77.20 ± 4.79 |
3 | 81.77 ± 6.50 | 78.26 ± 6.82 | 78.27 ± 6.65 | 80.95 ± 4.16 | 75.59 ± 5.06 | 78.26 ± 4.74 | 79.37 ± 8.46 |
4 | 80.46 ± 6.72 | 77.99 ± 4.47 | 77.20 ± 4.86 | 82.53 ± 7.20 | 77.21 ± 4.39 | 78.56 ± 5.63 | 78.77 ± 7.73 |
5 | 81.23 ± 5.68 | 78.02 ± 4.97 | 77.43 ± 6.11 | 80.94 ± 7.94 | 76.38 ± 8.32 | 79.65 ± 6.00 | 78.55 ± 7.54 |
6 | 81.49 ± 7.66 | 77.97 ± 6.31 | 76.93 ± 4.28 | 81.47 ± 6.87 | 76.44 ± 7.62 | 76.64 ± 7.43 | 77.16 ± 7.58 |
7 | 80.43 ± 7.27 | 77.25 ± 7.64 | 78.28 ± 4.85 | 79.64 ± 4.35 | 74.77 ± 10.91 | 80.72 ± 3.82 | 78.85 ± 5.80 |
8 | 81.79 ± 3.66 | 76.63 ± 5.56 | 79.04 ± 7.04 | 82.28 ± 6.69 | 72.99 ± 8.22 | 79.90 ± 4.68 | 80.93 ± 6.98 |
9 | 81.79 ± 6.85 | 78.02 ± 7.79 | 77.77 ± 6.75 | 82.02 ± 6.78 | 72.61 ± 9.05 | 79.62 ± 6.75 | 79.04 ± 7.51 |
10 | 84.21 ± 4.99 | 77.45 ± 7.97 | 78.02 ± 4.68 | 83.09 ± 6.27 | 73.98 ± 8.57 | 80.11 ± 5.53 | 80.17 ± 7.17 |
Average | 81.694 ± 1.05 | 77.876 ± 0.66 | 77.900 ± 0.66 | 81.354 ± 1.12 | 74.744 ± 1.87 | 79.186 ± 1.16 | 78.616 ± 1.45 |
Ttest p-value | 4.82E-06 (*) | 1.77E-06 (*) | 0.3594 (-) | 1.00E-05 (*) | 3.89E-04 (*) | 1.66E-04 (*) |