Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Aug 15.
Published in final edited form as: Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2021 Aug 3;137:103625. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2021.103625

Table 1.

Voltage dependence of activation and inactivation of BgNav1–1a and mutants.

Nav channel type Activation
Inactivation
n
V1/2 (mV) k (mV) V1/2 (mV) k (mV)

BgNav1–1a − 29.6 ± 1.3 4.6 ± 0.4 − 49.2±1.0 4.7 ± 0.1 11
IIIS1-E1K − 31.3 ± 1.2 5.6 ± 0.2 −56.1 ± 0.9* 5.1 ± 0.1 26
IIIS1-E2K − 30.8 ± 1.0 7.4 ± 0.4 − 61.9 ± 1.1* 5.2 ± 0.1 13
IIIS2-E2K − 31.1 ± 1.6 6.6 ± 0.3 − 53.7 ± 1.2* 6.0 ± 0.2 13
IIIS2-D1K −26.0 ± 0.9* 7.1 ± 0.2 − 43.7 ± 1.2* 3.7 ± 0.2 13
IIIR4E − 36.2 ± 1.8* 4.6 ± 0.4 − 49.2 ± 1.0 4.7 ± 0.1 11
IIIS2-D1K/IIIR4E − 41.2 ± 1.2* 8.1 ± 0.2 − 79.3 ± 1.5* 8.8 ± 0.5 15

The voltage dependence values of conductance and inactivation were fitted with a two-state Boltzmann equation to determine V1/2, the voltage for half maximal conductance or inactivation, and k, the slope factor for conductance or inactivation. The values in the table represent the mean ± SEM, and n is the number of oocytes tested. The asterisks indicate significant differences as determined by one-way ANOVA (p < 0.05) with Scheffe’s post hoc analysis.